Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Does anyone have a list of the patents? (Score 1) 309

by Zak3056 (#43677599) Attached to: Microsoft's Most Profitable Mobile Operating System: Android

Plus backup, server licence, admins, storage.... Outlook licence. And to add insulte to injury, the licence is even more expensive than direct competitor like IBM lotus note and Novell groupwise.... and that's not considering open source alternative.

Exchange cost a lot.

Backup, admins, storage are going to be required no matter what you're running--even if you're only running postfix and courier. I'll grant the cost of the server license, but that too is fairly cheap (around $700 last I looked). Amortized it across a user base of any reasonable size, and it's at most a couple of bucks a user per year. If it's more than this, your userbase is so small that you should probably be looking at a hosted solution, anyway.

In either case, "horribly expensive" is a gross overstatement at best.

Comment: Re:Does anyone have a list of the patents? (Score 2) 309

by Zak3056 (#43675587) Attached to: Microsoft's Most Profitable Mobile Operating System: Android

Problem is, it is Microsoft, and horribly expensive.

Exchange costs about $60-70 per user for a CAL. Even if you're constantly upgrading to the latest version of Exchange, that's a hair over $20 a year. You and I have different definitions of "horribly expensive." Compared to the cost of a full time employee, $20 is noise.

Comment: Re:Fourth Amendment (Score 1) 457

by Zak3056 (#43668511) Attached to: US DOJ Say They Don't Need Warrants For E-Mail, Chats

But if you simply give your stuff to someone else, you lose that protection. I pay nothing to Google for their gmail. It's on their servers.

I find that to be an indefensible position. Just because Google has my data on their servers does NOT mean that the government has the right to access that data (or at least, according to a simple reading of the 4th amendment, SHOULD not mean so). Things are different if Google decides to give my data to the government--the government didn't violate my privacy, Google did, and my remedy here is limited to suing Google for breaching my privacy in this way.

The obvious next step down the slippery slope here is Google agreeing to supply all of my data to the government (in return for some consideration) but I would argue that, at this point, they are functioning as agents of the government, and the 4th amendment again applies.

I don't believe case law backs my interpretation--but then again, case law says that growing wheat and eating it is "interstate commerce" so YMMV...

Comment: Re:Ultimately we do need more government intervent (Score 3, Interesting) 717

by Zak3056 (#43643929) Attached to: The First Fully 3D-Printed Gun Has Been Successfully Test-Fired

The NRA is a sportsmen's organization that advocates for the rights of hunters. Historically the NRA has been for gun control, having helped draft the ban on fully automatic weapons in the 1980's.

I will be charitable, and assume you are misinformed. Otherwise, you're either talking out of your ass, or just plain knowingly lying.

The NRA was incorporated after the end of the Civil War by former Union general officers to improve the general level of marksmanship among the population--because, as Ambrose Burnside put it, "Out of ten soldiers who are perfect in drill and the manual of arms, only one knows the purpose of the sights on his gun or can hit the broad side of a barn." It's mission is TRAINING the same and effective use of firearms. Hunting had exactly nothing to do with the purpose of the organization--though, of course, the NRA DOES support hunting, since it is one of the shooting sports.

As for your comment about the 1986 ban on machine guns, the NRA most certainly did NOT help draft that legislation. The ban was attached to legislation that the NRA DID help draft, the Firearms Owners Protection Act, which undid some of the worst parts of the Gun Control Act of 1968. After the amendment was adopted, the thinking was that the ban on machine guns, while not desirable, was worth getting the rest of the bill enacted into law.

Comment: Short term thinking (Score 1) 58

by Zak3056 (#43614905) Attached to: Lenovo To Drop Iomega Brand On Joint EMC Products

Sounds like short term thinking to me--EMC makes some short term cash, but now their brand is associated with low end NAS devices instead (or at least in addition to) top tier back end storage? This sounds like when Cisco bought Linksys, and rebranded some of the products, with rather predictable results. What idiot wants a low end product associated with a premium brand name?

Comment: Re:Totally arbitrary anyway (Score 2) 215

by Zak3056 (#43506651) Attached to: Statistical Errors Keep 4700 K-3rd Students From NYC 'Gifted' Programs

Move to suburbia. Even if the kid still doesn't make the cut for the gifted program, he'll receive a far higher quality education than he would in even the best of urban schools.

Complete bullshit. Just to pick a name that everybody knows, Bronx High School of Science is as good as, and maybe better than, any suburban schools, by any standard. There are some very good high schools in New York City, and every upscale parent knows which ones they are.

You're ignoring the fact that suburbs are expensive, and they self-select for wealthy families. That's often the reason people move to the suburbs.

Speaking as someone who went to Brooklyn Tech, I have a high respect for Bronx Science and find your description of it as "as good as, maybe better than any suburban school," to border on insulting. The specialized schools in NYC are some of the best in the country, hands down. That said, this in no way invalidates the point the GP was making--that suburban schools are, typically, of higher quality than large city schools. Brooklyn Tech, Bronx Science, and Stuyvesant are places where the entire school is in the "gifted program" and do not reflect the quality of city schools overall.

Comment: Re:being your own boss (Score 1) 426

by Zak3056 (#43418367) Attached to: "Micro-Gig" Sites Undermining Workers Rights?

A police officer or firefighter can retire at 50 with 90% of their base pay...

And that was part of the compensation package the city agreed to pay them when they took their job. Retroactive compensation cuts are bullshit, fraud to the nth degree.

Apologies on one point, I misread part of your post, so my coming off as correcting you just looks dickish. That said, while I agree in principle that retroactive cuts are bullshit, I disagree that the cause of the problem was financial mismanagement. The real root cause is that the compensation packages were not viable from day one.

Comment: Re:being your own boss (Score 1) 426

by Zak3056 (#43416595) Attached to: "Micro-Gig" Sites Undermining Workers Rights?

Bullshit. Some towns became insolvent because they entered into agreements to pay employees some money now and some at a later time, and then so badly mismanaged their finances -- largely through giving more and more tax breaks to the wealthy -- that they couldn't follow up on their obligation to pay people the agreed-upon compensation. Blaming unions for right-wing policies that benefit the 1% while screwing workers is ludicrous.

While on the high end for public sector employees, "Public Safety" pensions in California most certainly do not fall into your rant above. They are, frankly, obscene and are indeed a large part of why many municipalities have financial problems. A police officer or firefighter can retire at 50 with 90% of their base pay (which is usually considerable--a CHP officer earns between $68-84k per year not including overtime pay (which is $48-61 per hour). Their pension is calculated based on the 3 highest earning years.

Please note that the above numbers are BASE pay, and they can (and do) earn significantly more. See here for details. I would assume that CHP officers are probably paid more than a local sheriff's deputy, but my understanding is that many municipalities in CA are competitive with this structure.

To sum up: While the devil is in the details, it quite easy to make the statement the OP did and NOT be full of shit.

Comment: Re:being your own boss (Score 1) 426

by Zak3056 (#43416469) Attached to: "Micro-Gig" Sites Undermining Workers Rights?

Bullshit. Whether or not you're unionized, you can thank unions for the 40 hour workweek (which is dying with the unions), weekends off, lunch breaks, coffee breaks, vacations... any working stiff who is against unions is an idiot that has fallen for the right wing's bullshit.

Because Henry Ford was a well known organizer of unions, and all...

Comment: Re:Sense of proportion (Score 1) 346

by Zak3056 (#43405415) Attached to: EA Repeats As 'Worst Company In America'

Gotta love sense of proportion. You've got companies like Monsanto and Academi (formerly Blackwater) and a raft of multinationals polluting and doing bad stuff - but the one that causes the outrage? EA..

Bank of America vs EA:

1. Cratered the economy? ehhhh...
2. Botched launch of a time waster game? GET THE TORCHES AND PITCHFORKS!

Comment: Re:More spending.... (Score 1) 190

by Zak3056 (#43394429) Attached to: Is $100 Million Per Year Too Little For The Brain Map Initiative?

I agree! For a 100mil we could get 2/3 of a F22. Think about it for a minute, in 10 years we could add another 6 to the 187 we already have.

Or we could, you know, borrow $100,000,000 less every year. I know that's outside the box thinking and all, but where the hell has this dichotomy come from where, when we have a spending problem, we always hear, "Well, it's better than spending $VALUE on $INITIATIVE?" Military and social spending BOTH have to come down, and revenue (somehow) has to come UP if we're to get out of the mess we're in. I'm all for basic research (as someone else up thread noted, nothing in history has paid dividends like it) but the barrel has a bottom, we have a crisis of unprecedented historical proportions, and no one in government seems to give a fuck about fixing it.

Comment: Re:Good enough for what they are designed for... (Score 1) 344

by Zak3056 (#43277855) Attached to: The ATF Not Concerned About 3D Printed Guns... Yet

Spoken like someone who has never had to actually prep G-code, fixture a part or debug mill routing. CNC machining is a technical discipline requiring real skill and experience.\

...and once an expert builds out the program for the tool, any idiot can load it and run it.

Begathon, n.: A multi-day event on public television, used to raise money so you won't have to watch commercials.

Working...