That is exactly my point - they take money but they are nevertheless amateurs.

Not even that. Their price/performance ratio is mediocre due to lack of professionalism.

As I said, it did happen before.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
A bit flip separately might not be a big deal. A bit flip coupled with unexpected hardware or software limitations can break things that seem impossible for break.

It is far fetched because multiple persons can and will look at the same price at the same time.

Airbus does have triple redundancy in all of their fly by wire aircraft, but it can happen (and has actually happened at least once) that two sources return the same defective data.

Russian authorities always lie, even if telling the truth would have been beneficial to them. They can't help themselves.

And about 3.6 roentgen.

Douglas Adams used a dissimile, so it should be "in the same way a brick isn't above the Sargasso Sea".

Perhaps the leftist mainly disagree with racists, hence the tendency?

But significantly worse for everything else. Chatgpt is more like a jack of all trades, master of none.

Well, the current chairman of the board is an engineer. Probably more of an engineer than the average majority of slashdotters.

The Boeing CEO responsible for the 737max fiasco was an engineer, not a bean counter. And the best Boeing CEO was a lawyer, not an engineer.

It can very well be true, though, that one government entity is not allowed to share personal data with another government entity.

The guy responsible for leaded gasoline inhaled that stuff during a press conference, lying that the stuff is safe and then later taking a leave of absence to recover from lead poisoning. That was in 1924.

Seems to me that it already is. ChatGPT is significantly better at reading circuit diagrams (although it struggles with them too). Still, in this regard (and generally electronics) ChatGPT performs better than both Claude and Gemini.