Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment "Smaller than a hair" - no (Score 1) 15

If you read the article carefully, they are talking about lenses THINNER than a hair. I see several of the posts here thinking the width/radius of the lenses is this small, a reasonable mistake given the way this was written. Having a radius that small would severely reduce their light gathering ability, requiring very bright light or very dim images or very long exposure times.

-

Slashdot Top Deals

RAM wasn't built in a day.

Working...