Forgot your password?

Comment: Re:What a fscking disaster (Score 2) 361

by Phs2501 (#47003111) Attached to: How Firefox Will Handle DRM In HTML

Youtube uses EME for 1080p streams, no EME and you only get 720p or lower

Youtube uses Media Source Extensions for 1080p streams. That's completely different; it's a way to source data to a <video> element from Javascript. They use it to implement their dynamic HTTP streaming, where rather than just sucking down a file you suck down individual file segments allowing dynamic quality adjustments based on your available bandwidth. There's no DRM involved.

Comment: Re:Framing the debate (Score 3, Informative) 280

by Phs2501 (#45700861) Attached to: Theo De Raadt Says FreeBSD Is Just Catching Up On Security

And Git's hashes are not for the sake of security. Linus made that abundantly clear when he refused to allow SHA-2 to be used, even after people were able to manufacture a Git collision using SHA-1.

Citation needed. I can't find a published example of any actual SHA-1 collision, much less one from a Git repo.

Comment: Re:How much of the 'operating system' needs to sig (Score 2) 393

by Phs2501 (#40412347) Attached to: Ubuntu Lays Plans For Getting Past UEFI SecureBoot

Something like a config option - 'Enable OS installation for one boot cycle.'

If the purpose of secureboot were just to secure the boot process, that's all it'd take.

That limitation isn't possible, because the UEFI/BIOS is not a hypervisor. Once something else is running in ring 0 there is no way to prevent it from doing whatever it wants. Implementing those kind of hardware locks would entail a much more serious change to many parts of the PC architecture.

The whole system of key signing is a rather obvious attempt to squeeze all the little players out of the game so the big boys can seize more power and profits.

Despite the above, this statement is probably quite accurate, though. It's certainly a convenient side-effect.

Comment: Re:In other news (Score 1) 710

by Phs2501 (#40361773) Attached to: <em>The Hobbit's</em> Higher Frame Rate To Cost Theater Operators

What are you talking about?

Home video was traditionally 24 or fewer frames per second. (Unless by "traditionally" you mean the past few years when you could record digital video at more than 30 frames per second.)

The GP poster is correct. Super 8mm film is not "video" and hence is not "home video". NTSC VHS is absolutely 60 fields per second. The only way to get 24 FPS on VHS is with 3:2 pulldown, which no consumer cameras I know of ever did. Even getting close to a "real" simultaneously-sampled 30 frames per second instead of 60 interlaced fields would require a sample-and-hold, which again consumer VHS camcorders didn't have AFAIK.

Comment: Re:Adds bufferbloat and reduces VoIP sound quality (Score 2) 275

by Phs2501 (#38817217) Attached to: Google's SPDY Could Be Incorporated Into Next-Gen HTTP

You should have updated to IPv6, where is no such checksum in TCP.

I think you're misinformed. IPv6 has no IP header checksum, unlike IPv4. However, the higher-level protocol checksums are still there; in fact, UDP over IPv6 is required to include a valid checksum, unlike in IPv4 where it can optionally be 0x0000.

Comment: IPv6 (Score 1) 70

by Phs2501 (#36656452) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Which Registrars Support DNSSEC?
As an additional factor, who other than GoDaddy supports both DNSSEC and easy-and-prompt-to-configure IPv6 glue records? I specifically moved from Network Solutions to GoDaddy because it took NetSol weeks to set up my IPv6 glue. (Their interface at the time was "Email us at and we'll get around to it eventually. Maybe." Maybe they've added it to their admin interface at this point...)

Lots of folks confuse bad management with destiny. -- Frank Hubbard