The 72% non-work is comical - The gimmick crowd. They vanish once the operating costs get applied.
No. Some portion of those are paid users. The distribution is not given.
There is 1 person paying $200/mo, and 4 paying $20/mo in my office alone that I know of.
The 72% non-work
That number is not credible. The prompts I write for "personal" purposes are literally indistinguishable from what a worker might make: for all ChatGPT knows I'm an auto mechanic. Location isn't a valid metric either, given WFH, mobile devices, etc. They can't possibly distinguish between work and personal to a one digit of precision. Obviously they can see whether prompts are coming from commercial accounts, paid personal accounts or free tier, but even that gets fuzzy at the low end.
You don't get to bring that up unprompted and then play "this is personal" to get out of justifying what was claimed.
Sure one does.
It holds exactly as much weight either way- an anecdote of dubious origin.
This is rsilvergun after all, someone who is fond of calling me a right-wing nutjob.
More so, the question can easily be addressed categorically, without naming people and events.
Sure it can- but frankly, that's none of your fucking business.
The claim isn't remotely controversial, so why ask for details? I think you just want to force him somewhere he won't go so that you can point and say, "ha! See? The sky isn't blue after all!"
The original claim that ACA saved rsliver's friends and family lives. If that was the actual case, there would be factual account of how and why.
Nonsense. That's personal information and frankly none of your business.
The point is, it's so fucking plausible to not be worth questioning.
The real point you failed to address, of course, is that Democratic policies are in general made life more miserable and expensive for everyone, even if it happened to save some lives somewhere, perhaps by accident. This is largely because Democrats in general and rabid leftists like you in particular are not friends with logic and reason, instead choosing to emote your way into counterproductive and often harmful action.
lol- you fucking moron.
I'm called a Trump supporter, a leftist, a communist and a fascist on this site.
What I really am, is not a partisan dumbshit like you.
The population does better under Democrats. This is a fact. It's been studies so much at this point that denying it can only be called funny. At least be clever and say something like, "Those Democratic governments merely did better because of the lag from the actions of the previous Republican administration".
I can mention bad shit about the Democratic party all day long. But you- you have to deny facts, otherwise your simple little fucking brain can't make sense of the world.
You are 100% certified delusional and a danger to society if you believe that spoken words of criticism in any form or shape justify shooting someone in the neck to death.
Nice try, piece of shit.
I didn't say that in the slightest.
I said the fucker who got shot advocated for it.
The quote that immediately follows that is Charlie Kirk's.
You do understand that at some point people on the right will start shooting back, don't you?
This is exactly what I'd expect of someone like you. So steeped in partisanship your brain has gone to mush.
Right-wingers have been shooting for a while now- you just fucking ignored it.
This political violence isn't new. It's merely escalating. And "right-wingers" are just as eager to play.
More so, none of the quotes you provided raise to the level of a threat by any reasonable interpretation.
They sure the fuck do- a threat to take away one's rights.
I never said they represent a threat to their personal safety.
You don't really have an argument, do you? You just make shit up and throw punches at it.
Are you actually capable of saying anything that you don't regurgitate from one of your favorite talking heads?
Did he attack him directly or verbally? These are not the same thing.
Incorrect.
Attack does not confer physical or nonphysical meaning. You know the answer to your rhetorical question, even if you're ignorant of the definition of the words you're wielding.
Words have meaning and that meaning matter when we discussing shooting someone in the neck.
Indeed. Which is why I'm not going to let you whitewash dude's daily attack posture as nothing.
You bitch about people calling him a fascist, while he openly said shit like this:
The American Democrat party hates this country. They wanna see it collapse. They love it when America becomes less white.
The great replacement strategy, which is well under way every single day in our southern border, is a strategy to replace white rural America with something different.
We need to have a Nuremberg-style trial for every gender-affirming clinic doctor. We need it immediately.
Happening all the time in urban America, prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people, that’s a fact. It’s happening more and more.
Nobody should get shot in the neck for talking shit. Not even for threatening to steal someones rights.
However, if someone were to shoot him in the neck for threatening his rights... well,
I think it’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the second amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational.
For little stuff, I find it literally slower to wait for AI to spit out the code I asked for, than to just type it myself.
This is quite obviously a lie.
Come up with 1 page summary of an application that you want. All the things it has to do.
I will complete it with an LLM in 15-20 minutes.
You will take hours.
The LLM produces tokens faster than I can type, and I can type faster than you.
What AI is actually good for, is stuff where you know exactly what to do, but might not know the exact syntax or the exact API signature.
NO. Fucking hell. RTFM. Asking teh AI to hallucinate non-existent objects and methods into existence?
You're clearly making this shit up. Why?
"This isn't brain surgery; it's just television." - David Letterman
