Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Slashdot Deals: Prep for the CompTIA A+ certification exam. Save 95% on the CompTIA IT Certification Bundle ×

Comment Re:Blasphemy! Oh boy. (Score 1) 482

I wonder how many people will die over this revelation?

None, because nobody will give a shit. The same goes for little things that contradict any other religion. Christianity, Mormonism, etc etc. Plenty of evidence to contradict it. In this case, it's not even that contradictory, which is why it's a minor thing, not some Earth-shaking revelation that contradicts all of the teachings of Islam. The dates are still within his lifetime so he still could have received the words from God. Even if you want to take it all at face value, perhaps it means the Koran was compiled (written down in one place) a few years early that originally believed, which is a small detail that doesn't completely shake up Islam. The dates are close enough such that those who still want to believe the Koran wasn't actually compiled until 650AD could reasonably assume that the paper could be 18 years older when it was written on.

Comment Why pay to beta test? (Score 1) 145

Why should municipalities be paying for these "pilots?" They're really beta-testers of new stuff. The companies should be paying for the beta test, not the taxpayers. This applies to all kinds of things, not just IoT, although I know /. commenters really like to bitch about IoT.

In my municipality, the corrupt mayoral administration wants to do waste-to-energy. Okay, great, the problem is that they want to be a beta-test for an entirely new technology - a method of fermenting municipal solid waste into biofuel. The company, Anaergia, has plants in Europe that convert cow poop, human poop, and food waste into fertilizer and some fuel, but that's very, very different than regular trash. Same bullshit. Whether it's IoT or any other domain, municipalities shouldn't be footing the bill and the risk to beta test a for-profit company's technology.

Comment Re:watch the test conditions carefully (Score 1) 462

The F-35 will win, and the pork will continue to flow to the hundreds of congressional districts that get money from the F-35. The A-10 doesn't funnel billions of dollars to congressional districts

That is no longer the case. It doesn't have anything to do with congressional districts any more, it has everything to do with campaign contributors. It used to be a congressman would go to his home district and say, "reelect me, I brought in X jobs!" But now, they simply are bribed by defense contractors from any district and then use that money on TV advertisements that convince the people in their district that the other side wants to take away their guns and their medical care, sell baby parts on eBay, and let Muslims behead their children.

Comment Re:Two wrongs don't make a right... (Score 1) 301

which will just cause someone else - presumably with better network security practices - to launch an identical service

People used the service because they thought it was a way to cheat without getting caught. While I'm sure there would be enough demand to make a future service profitable, I would expect the demand would be significantly reduced by this incident.

Comment Re:Did they make more than $750K profit by blockin (Score 1) 188

More to the point, if you keep getting fined for the same offenses, those fines are going to increase, and stronger measures may eventually be used to, if not assure compliance, then so damage the company that compliance ceases to be an issue.

So this company might stop doing it. But what about other companies doing this or other illegal things? It pretty much communicates that go you can go ahead and do whatever the heck you want until you get caught, because even after you've been busted the fine will be less than your profits. It's not like this is a new thing that they might not have known was illegal, they clearly just didn't give a shit because they knew if they got caught their illegal activity would still be profitable.

Comment Taking votes away from Sanders (Score 1) 458

If Lessig runs in the primary, he'll just be taking votes away from Sanders. Most anybody who would vote for Lessig would otherwise vote for Sanders, so if Sanders vs. Clinton would otherwise be extremely close, it could give Clinton the edge she needs to win the primary. If Lessig really cares about his ideals then he won't run.

Comment Re:You just described SoylentNews. (Score 1) 552

You've basically just described SoylentNews, a Slashdot clone that appeared when the Slashdot Beta shit really started heating up.

And you know what? I think it's clear that it's an absolute hell-hole that's worse than Slashdot today, even!

That community is small. It's small because many of the regular users there are best described as obnoxious extremists. They naturally drive away most normal users with their toxicity.

Then it's not really a slashdot clone (assuming what you say is true). I mean, the site may be a clone, but for most of us the community is what makes it what it is. Without the community, the thing as a whole is not a clone.

He: Let's end it all, bequeathin' our brains to science. She: What?!? Science got enough trouble with their OWN brains. -- Walt Kelly

Working...