Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

+ - Is open-source more secure then closed source?->

Submitted by Meshach
Meshach (578918) writes "Interesting article about whether open source sofware is able to be secured against threats as well as closed-source software. Open-source advocates say they are more secure than proprietary software because developers are constantly fixing flaws found by users. The recent Heartbleed and Shellshock outbreaks vindicate this theory. Critics say the open nature of the software leaves it vulnerable to hackers because the programing flaws are out in the open for all to see."
Link to Original Source

Comment: For anyone else scratching their heads (Score 1) 112

by Meshach (#48107487) Attached to: National Security Letter Issuance Likely Headed To Supreme Court
From the Wikipedia article on National_security_letter: A national security letter (NSL) is an administrative subpoena issued by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in authorized national security investigations "to protect against international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities" (i.e., spying).

+ - Google heavily critizied for releasing new Bomb Gaza game->

Submitted by Meshach
Meshach (578918) writes "Google is being heavily critisized for releasing a game called "Bomb Gaza". Users play the part of Isreal and they drop bombs on terrorists and avoid civillians. The desctiption on the play store is as follows: “Terrorist cells are launching rockets into your country, do you have what it takes to protect your citizens?” A few users have complained but Google has been unavailable for comment."
Link to Original Source

Comment: The committment was only for three years (Score 5, Interesting) 81

From the article:

Those rules were written in 2010 — and AT&T has pledged to abide by them for three years if its DirecTV purchase goes through — but were knocked down by a federal court in January.

Even if AT&T did abide by these rules in three years their commitment is over and they can do what they want.

Comment: Re:google doens't need to stir up dissent (Score 1) 74

by Meshach (#47385293) Attached to: Google Reinstating Some 'Forgotten' Links

People see this law for what it is, a way for the rich/politicians/scum to get rid of stories that make them look like the twats they are.

To be fair the idea is for results that are libelous or potentially (legally) damaging to a person to be removed. Making someone look like a twat is not to be removed (or at least should not be deleted). Google seems to be pushing the envelope on what they are removing to provoke resistance to the law in the hope of getting it changed.

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (10) Sorry, but that's too useful.

Working...