I've just got this message from the Slashdot Message System:

Comment Moderation
sent by Slashdot Message System on 0:05 Wednesday 25 June 2008

Surprising? , posted to Google Abandons the Gmail Name In Germany , has been moderated Insightful (+1).

It is currently scored Insightful (4).

Surprising? , posted to Google Abandons the Gmail Name In Germany , has been moderated Insightful (+1).

It is currently scored Insightful (5).

Surprising? , posted to Google Abandons the Gmail Name In Germany , has been moderated Overrated (-1).

It is currently scored Insightful (4).

Surprising? , posted to Google Abandons the Gmail Name In Germany , has been moderated Insightful (+1).

It is currently scored Insightful (5).

Surprising? , posted to Google Abandons the Gmail Name In Germany , has been moderated Overrated (-1).

It is currently scored Insightful (4).

Surprising? , posted to Google Abandons the Gmail Name In Germany , has been moderated Overrated (-1).

It is currently scored Insightful (3).

Surprising? , posted to Google Abandons the Gmail Name In Germany , has been moderated Insightful (+1).

It is currently scored Insightful (4).

Surprising? , posted to Google Abandons the Gmail Name In Germany , has been moderated Insightful (+1).

It is currently scored Insightful (5).

Insightful , posted to Brendan Eich Discusses the Future of JavaScript , has been moderated Insightful (+1).

It is currently scored Insightful (2).

Surprising? , posted to Google Abandons the Gmail Name In Germany , has been moderated Overrated (-1).

It is currently scored Insightful (4).

Surprising? , posted to Google Abandons the Gmail Name In Germany , has been moderated Insightful (+1).

It is currently scored Insightful (5).

Insightful , posted to Brendan Eich Discusses the Future of JavaScript , has been moderated Interesting (+1).

It is currently scored Interesting (3).

Surprising? , posted to Google Abandons the Gmail Name In Germany , has been moderated Overrated (-1).

It is currently scored Insightful (4).

Surprising? , posted to Google Abandons the Gmail Name In Germany , has been moderated Insightful (+1).

It is currently scored Insightful (5).

Surprising? , posted to Google Abandons the Gmail Name In Germany , has been moderated Overrated (-1).

It is currently scored Insightful (4).

Insightful , posted to Brendan Eich Discusses the Future of JavaScript , has been moderated Interesting (+1).

It is currently scored Interesting (4).

Surprising? , posted to Google Abandons the Gmail Name In Germany , has been moderated Insightful (+1).

It is currently scored Insightful (5).

Surprising? , posted to Google Abandons the Gmail Name In Germany , has been moderated Overrated (-1).

It is currently scored Insightful (4).

Surprising? , posted to Google Abandons the Gmail Name In Germany , has been moderated Overrated (-1).

It is currently scored Insightful (3).

Surprising? , posted to Google Abandons the Gmail Name In Germany , has been moderated Overrated (-1).

It is currently scored Insightful (2).

Surprising? , posted to Google Abandons the Gmail Name In Germany , has been moderated Insightful (+1).

It is currently scored Insightful (3).

Insightful , posted to Brendan Eich Discusses the Future of JavaScript , has been moderated Overrated (-1).

It is currently scored Interesting (3).

Surprising? , posted to Google Abandons the Gmail Name In Germany , has been moderated Insightful (+1).

It is currently scored Insightful (4).

Surprising? , posted to Google Abandons the Gmail Name In Germany , has been moderated Insightful (+1).

It is currently scored Insightful (5).

Surprising? , posted to Google Abandons the Gmail Name In Germany , has been moderated Overrated (-1).

It is currently scored Insightful (4).

Surprising? , posted to Google Abandons the Gmail Name In Germany , has been moderated Informative (+1).

It is currently scored Insightful (5).

Wait , posted to Real-World Firefox 3 Memory Usage Leads the Field , has been moderated Insightful (+1).

It is currently scored Insightful (2).

Wait , posted to Real-World Firefox 3 Memory Usage Leads the Field , has been moderated Informative (+1).

It is currently scored Informative (3).

Wait , posted to Real-World Firefox 3 Memory Usage Leads the Field , has been moderated Interesting (+1).

It is currently scored Interesting (4).

Wait , posted to Real-World Firefox 3 Memory Usage Leads the Field , has been moderated Informative (+1).

It is currently scored Informative (5).

This is too much , posted to RFID Tags Can Interfere With Medical Devices , has been moderated Overrated (-1).

It is currently scored Normal (0).

This is too much , posted to RFID Tags Can Interfere With Medical Devices , has been moderated Insightful (+1).

It is currently scored Insightful (1).

This is too much , posted to RFID Tags Can Interfere With Medical Devices , has been moderated Interesting (+1).

It is currently scored Interesting (2).

This is too much , posted to RFID Tags Can Interfere With Medical Devices , has been moderated Flamebait (-1).

It is currently scored Flamebait (1).

This is too much , posted to RFID Tags Can Interfere With Medical Devices , has been moderated Interesting (+1).

It is currently scored Interesting (2).

This is too much , posted to RFID Tags Can Interfere With Medical Devices , has been moderated Flamebait (-1).

It is currently scored Flamebait (1).

This is too much , posted to RFID Tags Can Interfere With Medical Devices , has been moderated Informative (+1).

It is currently scored Interesting (2).

This is too much , posted to RFID Tags Can Interfere With Medical Devices , has been moderated Flamebait (-1).

It is currently scored Flamebait (1).

This is too much , posted to RFID Tags Can Interfere With Medical Devices , has been moderated Troll (-1).

It is currently scored Flamebait (0).

This is too much , posted to RFID Tags Can Interfere With Medical Devices , has been moderated Interesting (+1).

It is currently scored Interesting (1).

This is too much , posted to RFID Tags Can Interfere With Medical Devices , has been moderated Overrated (-1).

It is currently scored Flamebait (0).

Needless to say, the conclusions are obvious.

This just came in:

Comment Moderation
sent by Slashdot Message System on 0:05 Thursday 26 June 2008

This is too much , posted to RFID Tags Can Interfere With Medical Devices , has been moderated Insightful (+1).

It is currently scored Flamebait (1).

Wait , posted to Real-World Firefox 3 Memory Usage Leads the Field , has been moderated Overrated (-1).

It is currently scored Informative (4).

This is too much , posted to RFID Tags Can Interfere With Medical Devices , has been moderated Insightful (+1).

It is currently scored Insightful (2).

This is too much , posted to RFID Tags Can Interfere With Medical Devices , has been moderated Overrated (-1).

It is currently scored Insightful (1).

This is too much , posted to RFID Tags Can Interfere With Medical Devices , has been moderated Troll (-1).

It is currently scored Flamebait (0).

This is too much , posted to RFID Tags Can Interfere With Medical Devices , has been moderated Informative (+1).

It is currently scored Flamebait (1).

This is too much , posted to RFID Tags Can Interfere With Medical Devices , has been moderated Funny (+1).

It is currently scored Insightful (2).

This is too much , posted to RFID Tags Can Interfere With Medical Devices , has been moderated Troll (-1).

It is currently scored Troll (1).

Interesting , posted to When Is a Self-Signed SSL Certificate Acceptable? , has been moderated Interesting (+1).

It is currently scored Interesting (2).

Interesting , posted to When Is a Self-Signed SSL Certificate Acceptable? , has been moderated Interesting (+1).

It is currently scored Interesting (3).

Interesting , posted to When Is a Self-Signed SSL Certificate Acceptable? , has been moderated Interesting (+1).

It is currently scored Interesting (4).

Interesting , posted to When Is a Self-Signed SSL Certificate Acceptable? , has been moderated Insightful (+1).

It is currently scored Interesting (5).

Interesting , posted to When Is a Self-Signed SSL Certificate Acceptable? , has been moderated Overrated (-1).

It is currently scored Interesting (4).

This is too much , posted to RFID Tags Can Interfere With Medical Devices , has been moderated Underrated (+1).

It is currently scored Insightful (2).

Interesting , posted to When Is a Self-Signed SSL Certificate Acceptable? , has been moderated Overrated (-1).

It is currently scored Interesting (3).

Interesting , posted to When Is a Self-Signed SSL Certificate Acceptable? , has been moderated Overrated (-1).

It is currently scored Interesting (2).

Interesting , posted to When Is a Self-Signed SSL Certificate Acceptable? , has been moderated Overrated (-1).

It is currently scored Interesting (1).

Not as numerous but the trend is evident.

I have some very bad news. I might not be able to post on Slashdot for some time. I am terribly sorry, but I am afraid it is inevitable. Unfortunately I cannot tell you any more details right now. I am sorry.

My work seeking the mysterious correlation between AQ (i.e. how someone is popular in the society at large) and IQ (i.e. how someone is clever, smart and intelligent) is finally completed. The results I got may surprise some of you. Here is what I have found out:

People with AQ 7 are most likely to have IQ over 150. People with AQ 11 are most likely to have IQ 175. People with AQ 16 usually have IQ in the range of 140-160, which is exactly the same range, which is the most common among people with AQ 17, however with AQ 17 about half of the people have IQ well over 150, just like all of the people with AQ 21 (the transition to the higher half of 140-160 range must be somewhere around AQ 18.5) and this trend continues up to the point of AQ 27. Then, over AQ 27 strange things happen. The AQ 28 is a usual value of former Mensa members, i.e. those people, who once used to have high IQ, which suddenly dropped below the acceptable level. Half of the people with AQ 28 however have IQ around 140 which is still acceptable in Mensa, however one would suspect a slow but noticable decreasing of IQ at this point. People with AQ 31 have IQ 179, but people with AQ 36 have strangely IQ only 170, and for AQ 39 the most common IQ semms to be 148. This is very interesting indeed. The optimal AQ seems to be exactly 31, which is the highest score one could get without being autistic. Any comments?

I will never write on Slashdot after using marijuana, the deadliest of drugs known to human kind. That is because I never use any drugs, especially the deadliest ones. No one should. I like my brain working with the full capacity, thank you.

Last night something absolutely incredible happened to me. You wouldn't believe. And that's why I won't tell you about it.

This is the new signature of mdielmann:

Mensa Babe calls me a foe over a definition. Sweet!

I find it very amusing that I am so famous here on Slashdot that people are even worshiping me in their signatures.

Unfortunately mdielmann is being terribly mistaken in one subtle aspect of this signature. I am talking about the link, which should point to this comment and instead of "over a definition" should read "because of childishly pointing out every single typo and mistake of her to feel smarter."

Otherwise it is very accurate. Thank you for your attention. Have a nice day.

I think that there are many nice and intelligent people here on Slashdot, therefore I am sure I will be strong enough to stay calm, while being constantly insulted by all of those childish and completely unintelligent individuals, whom I've always felt sorry for.

I have just taken an Autism-Spectrum Quotient test, and fortunately I got only 31 points, while 32 or higher is typical for people diagnosed with autism or some related disorders. I am really glad I haven't scored 32, it was so close... I wonder how many points in this test have other people on Slashdot scored, especially those with IQ higher than 150. I am trying to find some correlation between IQ and AQ. I would be really glad if anyone could provide her AQ score together with a little background information. Thank you very much indeed.