It's been a while since I read my 80s techno thrillers, but the idea was a nuke sub (or mobile land-based launchers, in theory, but I don't think they ever bothered with that) would use GPS to get an exact fix on where it was, and input that into the missiles as their start point for inertial navigation. This allowed for 'first-strike' capability, which required silly amounts of precision to hit hardened launch sites on short notice, before enemy C&C could authorize retaliatory strikes, and simultaneously denied the enemy the ability to perform a first-strike on you, as first they'd have to find your hidden SSBNs.
The GPS system was originally called 'NavStar,' as it was intended as a navigation aide. The missiles themselves were intended to be as autonomous as possible after launch; after all, the GPS satellites were easy to find and destroy, what with them broadcasting their locations.
So what would you rather have, a health-care system at the expense of some unneeded jobs, or a jobs-creation system at the expense of much-needed healthcare?
Or are you advocating for FDR style programs to employ Americans?
And the same is true of the states. Trying to cross the border from Canada into the States to start a job, transferring a Canadian company to it's brand new American owner, and getting stopped. Should have been a thirty second conversation with the border folks, under Trade NAFTA. Nope. I was trying to steal an American Jerb, and that was that.
The company started to lawyer up, but I declined to continue the process, and stayed in Canada. What can I say, I was young, and foolish. In retrospect, I made the correct choice.
If Wikipedia is imperfect, and the response is 'neither is Britannia, or Merriam-Webster, or whatever,' then I think the point is, indeed, being missed completely.
The response *should* be 'You're right. But unlike Britannia, or Merriam-Webster, or whatever, we can, indeed, improve Wikipedia.'
Thus illustrating the problem with American political thought; the believe that all political thought is a single, binary choice, an not a whole series of spectrums.
Guess what? It IS, in fact, possible, to be a 'liberal' and be pro-gun. It IS, in fact, possible to be a 'conservative' and be pro-choice.
Nope, just appropriate venue for appropriate material.
Or are you advocating that churches should give 'equal time' during services to 'alternate theroies?'
No, teachers can and should discuss the strengths and weaknesses of all sorts of theories.
"The Bible says the world is only 6000 years old" however, is not 'discussion of a weakness' of any theory, at all.
Put another way, should teachers 'teach the controversy' that the Bible clearly states that Pi is actually 3?
And he [Hiram] made a molten sea, ten cubits from the one rim to the other it was round all about, and...a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about....And it was an hand breadth thick....
-- First Kings, chapter 7, verses 23 and 26
"The value of marriage is not that adults produce children, but that children produce adults." -- Peter De Vries