And they're allowed, as a private company, to decide what results to show and not show.
Or do you advocate that the Government take away their right to freedom of speech by using force of law to dictate what they are and are not allowed to say?
Also, if 'the state' doesn't mean 'the federal government,' as the dissent seems to think, somebody better call the US State Department and tell them that they're using the term wrong.
Also, tell the POTUS that he's no longer the Head of State.
Actually, we still haven't got a clue as to what the longterm problems might be with Wifi.. There are studies which suggest it IS harmfull..
Please link to peer-reviewed, reproducible tests and studies showing standard Wi-Fi routers produce harmful radiation.
Take your time, we'll wait.
If they choose to believe that non-interfering RF is causing them great harm, what is the harm in allowing them to hold that belief? It appears they are only harming themselves in so doing; outsiders can choose to visit other towns instead. Make no mistake that I don't agree with their ideas of Wi-Fi causing harm to humans, but I also don't see how their idea hurts anyone outside their own group.
Ignorance is harm in and of itself, let alone the idea that, if they choose to blame something on an incorrect source (cows are dying because witches) they remove the possibility of finding and fixing the actual problem. (Cows are dying because contaminated feed, water, disease, whatever).