Straight from the horse's mouth:
Can you at least prefix the title with "Poll:" or something? Right now I see a collapsed article with the title "Ross Ulbricht was sentenced to life in prison, and
Please think of the bunnies.
Ads? What ads? Am I the only one who messes with settings?
I'm sure you should change these settings at your own risk. But it was worth the risk to me.
URL filtering engine to block most ad banners
You can open up to 10 tabs.
This threw me off too, because "65 million cycles per minute of spectrum" hurts my brain.
However, "spectrum" is defined as "frequency range", similarly to how you can talk about "temperature range". If today's high temperature is 70F (20C) degrees and the low temperature is 50F (10C) degrees, then today's temperature-range is 20F degrees or 10C degrees. To define the range you need to include the unit in which the end points of the range are measured.
I still want to call the temperature range "20 F-temperature-points" and the spectrum "65 Mhz-frequency-points", but maybe that's because I skipped lunch. I shouldn't skip lunch.
The only good think about this Bennett Haselton post is that it gives us a break from the HughPickens.com posts.
This place is going down the shitter quick-like.
I hate Bennett. His posts are drivel.
I have to post this comment because otherwise Slashdot mods might think I clicked in to actually read said drivel. I did not. I only read Bennett posts for the funny comments.
Bennett Haselton needs to go away.
I love reading the comments on Bennett's posts, though. Makes me miss the old Microsoft-hate and vi-vs-emacs comments. Now everything is all level-headed +1 Informative. Bah.
Managers rise to the level of their incompetence.
I love systemd because it doesn't continuously spout inane drivel to my favorite news aggregator. When systemd has something to say, it does so in its own log separate file which I can read at my leisure (or ignore completely if I so choose). As far as I'm concerned, systemd is the model that should be followed by everyone.
Not only that, but this is just a weird form of Slashdot click bait.
"by making one small... Well, read the description below"
It's really weird how discussing getting downmodded based on the submitter instantly gets you downmodded. Does anyone actually prefer the content over the meta-discussion?
Contributor Bennett Haselton
I read TFA and couldn't find a link to the tool. I AM OUTRAGED!