If they're drafted by private parties and then copyright transferred to the US Gov't, Uncle Sam can hold the copyright.

Since the majority of bills are drafted by lobbyists, there's nothing in principle stopping Congress from blocking distribution on the grounds of protecting the copyright on the original special-interest draft and any derivative works.

And that explains why it must be prevented.

And curiously, a radio ad I hear a lot lately is starts off about the super-high-tech drains that can't clog. Then it goes on to say that those drains don't exist and pimps a drain-cleaning company.

So how long will it be before we have superhyrdophobic sewer pipe?

Both on the letter of the law and the root cause of the fact that to date, the only "displaced homemaker" recipients have been women.

Based on the Court's instructions regarding the law.

At least in Arizona, a divorced woman over 50 can get "spousal maintenance" for the rest of her life, not revisable due to circumstances (e.g. unemployment of the ex-husband, including retirement or disability.) Which might explain some of the 70-something greeters at Wal-Mart.

Is this judgment dischargable in bankruptcy? IIRC the law on that kind of thing changed rather dramatically a few years ago.

I now understand why the Court refused cert on Citizens United.

Surely he has organs he could sell.

That depends a lot on how much the page itself loads third-party scripts, Flash apps, etc. If you can't block them, it may not matter how fast your browser is.