Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
Hardware

Android a Tipping Point in Innovative Electronics->

Submitted by JoeBorn
JoeBorn writes "Neuros CEO has a posting discussing why electronics has been such a tough go for so many US small companies over the last couple decades, and why Android represents a potential economic tipping point that goes far beyond cell phones or the obvious significance of the technology itself. In the posting, he makes the case that Android has the potential to be an economic catalyst for garage hardware startups, similar in impact to the IBM PC of 30 years ago."
Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:Atom (Score 1) 199

by JoeBorn (#31813420) Attached to: How Neuros Built Their Nearly Silent HTPC
I'm from Neuros and as others have suggested, we'd LOVE to use an atom solution. The issue, as fuzzyfuzzyfungus suggested is that we can't anticipate what users will want to use the machine for, and sadly much of that is not optimized. flash 10.1 did not completely solve this problem (and its not available in 64bit yet anyway). Further, flash isn't the only inefficient application out there, and the entire point of our box is flexibility, and that you can run virtually any application you want without hassle. I would love to do what you are doing and go with an atom solution, it would save us money and hassle, and be more efficient. Its very close, but just not quiet there for what we're trying to do just yet. No one will be happier when that day comes.

Comment: Re:Wasted money on fluid bearing fans (Score 2, Interesting) 199

by JoeBorn (#31813314) Attached to: How Neuros Built Their Nearly Silent HTPC
I'm from Neuros (to get that out of the way) You shouldn't lump ball bearings in with fluid bearings. Fluid bearings combined the long life of ball bearings are are practically silent. But you are right about going big and slow. That's why the product uses a 120mm fan that's speed controlled, in typical use its under 1000 rpm and pretty much dead silent.

Comment: Re:Slashvertisement (Score 1) 199

by JoeBorn (#31813134) Attached to: How Neuros Built Their Nearly Silent HTPC
That's been my experience too, that the dB specs are meaningless because they are so filled with lies. This device is about as quiet as any fanned system gets and in any normal ambient environment you can't tell if its off or on from 3 feet away. You'd all but need to be in a sound proof room to hear it from 6 feet away.

Silent, discless HTPC v. a NetTop for your TV?->

Submitted by JoeBorn
JoeBorn writes "Neuros has a blog posting discussing how they created their latest "thin" HTPC to be nearly silent. Instead of using a net-top architecture (atom or the like) they used a full 2.7GHz CPU and put this effort into making that nearly silent. The article talks about their efforts on fan selection, placement, control and vibration dampening. This route was chosen to "give more headroom" for CPU hungry apps (web and otherwise) including adobe flash. The solution costs $279, Is this an appropriate tradeoff for a device powering your TV?"
Link to Original Source

YouTube Taking a Discriminatory Position with API->

Submitted by
JoeBorn
JoeBorn writes "Google has started to close down access to their YouTube API for some 3rd parties. The process and decision criterion are non-public and reportedly based on ability to pay for advertising. Having a big company like Google arbitrarily picking winners and losers up front is sure to have a chilling effect on innovation in the space, and should make users question the trust they've vested in the company founded on "doing no evil""
Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:But ATI doesn't support hardware x264 accelerat (Score 1) 121

by JoeBorn (#29011247) Attached to: Neuros LINK Mixes Quiet, Aesthetics, and Ubuntu

Also, if we're talking high end processors, we aren't talking about this particular device

A 2.8GHz single core is a pretty careful choice. It's a pretty good balance that supports a wide range of content, remember not everything supports multiple cores well (or hardware acceleration for example). This processor does everything up to 1080p24 (what you see on apple.com for example) and also supports flash video, etc. On one hand, there's a great deal of discussion of ION or other graphics centric solutions, which are great when that hardware matches *exactly* what you want to playback, but then try something not optimized (flash for example) and you are very limited. On the other side, there are more powerful CPUs, but the expense (and cooling requirements-noise go up) and in most applications you won't see one lick of improvement, I know because we tested a lot of them before settling on this one.

Envy is a pain of mind that successful men cause their neighbors. -- Onasander

Working...