Or that's how I think the headlines should read.
Visual SourceSafe would start corrupting repositories once they got above the 2 GB barrier. My last job had a 17 GB repository, and spent months trying to convert it to a different source control because of all the corruption issues.
To ask how that tax has been recast as the murder of all that's American (think of the family farms!!!! what family farms?)
So because the tax system has succeeded in destroying most of America's family farms it's OK now because there aren't any left? Huh?
I think it's ridiculous that most of the family farms left have had to incorporate, hire accountanting firms and use all the sneaky tricks just to stay in business and keep their land. The estate tax burden is a lot less on 1/6th of a farm when a stockholder dies and it's easier to get loans to cover it.
Also beware of statistics because some sources like to say family farms have vanished and all that's left is corporate farming. Are they counting family owned corporations as family or corporate?
Does income inequality actually matter though?
If Person A makes a million dollars a year but lives exactly the same lifestyle as Person B who makes $100,000 a year, does it matter?
It seems to me that no one would know or CARE if Person A has $100 million in investments and bank accounts if he lives just like everyone else.
So it is really more of a lifestyle inequality that makes people upset.
Deductions are important for anyone who is in business. If businesses (from one person muffin bakers, to 1,000 people factories) cannot deduct business expenses then that leads directly into heavy pressure to vertically integrate by buying suppliers and sellers. Until the only businesses that can compete are the Exxons and Conacos who own the oil rigs, the refineries, the pipelines, the trucks and the gas stations.
Otherwise each sale between business entities incurrs a 10% flat tax.
Finally the Linux kernel which runs almost the entire Internet is as secure as my MMORPG accounts. About time.
So here we have security vendors trying YET AGAIN to hold back progress in Internet protocols. They did it with window scaling, ECN and IPv6. Each new invention doesn't work with their snake oil so they either disable it or tell people not to use it.
They like to lock down HTTP too, preventing anything that doesn't "look right." As if a server would respond to PUT or OPTION if it didn't intend to support that.
Software that monitors the traffic for unusual patterns or attack patterns is not a firewall. It is an IDS (or IPS depending on configuration) such as Snort.
Consumer desktop PCs have "antivirus" software which is a combination of firewall, IDS, antivirus and other malware detection systems. Enterprise network admins have firewall, IDS, NAT, and many other systems with each one configured separately.
Network admins have many words for things like Eskimos do for snow because precision is important.
What about oil paintings? Didn't a lot of the Old Masters paint nudes? I bet some of them broke up with the subjects of the painting too.
I love it when people who don't know anything about networking invent solutions to problems. As if actual IETF engineers were all idiots.
Or since I apparently can't edit and my memory is faulty, the definitions of the words that make up "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;"
Because of the definitions of inter, state, and commerce.
But how do you know which parts are relevant to you?
I mean, you might think a little thing like the Constitution is perfectly clear when it lays out the rules for regulating interstate commerce. I bet you didn't know that growing wheat on your own small farm and eating it yourself is interstate commerce.
I was wrong about XP needing to map all 3 GB of video RAM.
It is more accurate to say that Windows XP limits the GPU to a 256 MB window. The GPU would perform a lot better if all of its memory was mapped for direct access.
The newer pieces of GPU hardware and drivers are using zero-copy direct memory access with addressing that is the same on the GPU and the CPU which allows sharing of data structures without copies or modifications. That can't be done in a 256 MB window, or if it can, not well.
Just saw the bit about epoxy. MAYBE the keyboard started out epoxied in place but when I saw it it sure wasn't. IT needs to put in a new keyboard, they probably chipped it out and replaced it. Not much would stop the user from doing that either.