In the end, the auto maker took his domain name.
Wait not in the end actually I just checked it he got the domain back but only after he died.

Not necessary. I could clearly hear Gene Wilder's voice as I read it.

Alfalfa and Spanky had the he-man woman-hater's club. We have these two atrocities.
bleah.

And have it shut down/removed from dns with no transparency or due process?
No risk of abuse here, nope not at all.

Nope, it was in Australia.

IIRC, it was in Canada. There was a lawsuit because the babies produced from the embryos would inherit an estate. anyhow, here it is...

NYT robot filter blocks the article.

This is an ad.

You're not missing something. Much like Disney's "Snow White" was called a "success" despite bombing both at the box office and on streaming, the corporate media stooges will blithely state the complete opposite in an attempt to hide abject failure. Ubisoft is no different.

AC fans waited years to get a game with samurai's based in feudal Japan. What they got is a "samurai" game with no actual Japanese samurai protagonist. Ubisoft's reason for this is painfully obvious to everyone. This is why Japanese consumers have largely rejected it and has a lot to do with why sales have tanked overall.

There's a saying for this that ends with "go broke." It's slipping my mind at the moment, but I'm sure it'll come to me eventually.

If more companies would not only put a monetary bounty on these crooks but also specify "dead or alive," perhaps it would start to put a dent in their activities. They're already operating from countries that either look the other way or actively assist them in their activities. Putting a death mark on them ups the stakes considerably and allows the use of...ahem...alternate actors...ahem...that can operate beyond the law to get actual results.

tl/dr:
the problem is the buyers don't understand that the hardware cost is included in their monthly payments.
Financial education needs to be part of basic high school curriculum.

Longer answer below:

When the buyer originally signed up they agreed to a 12-month subscription.
The cost of the hardware was baked into that subscription price.
Seller offers to supply upgraded Hardware before the 12-month period expires as long as buyer agrees to maintain the subscription for an additional 12 months. That's the same 12-month period over which the seller would ordinarily expect to receive payments for the new Hardware.

In the case of the upgrade after 6 months the seller eats the cost of the unpaid portion of the original Hardware.
The seller expected to recover the cost of the original Hardware over a 12-month period. But they only received payments for that original hardware for 6 months. If the hardware is in good condition the seller can put it in a new box and use it for a one month trial. There's a lot less value there than sitting there and collecting rents for another 6 months.

They're not charging the buyer for that unpaid portion of the original Hardware cost. That's free.

For corporate customers a remotely managed solution is the best.
The companybcertainly doesn't want to assume that every user carrying a laptop understands and applies in good security practices.
As far as Microsoft spying on corporate secrets, that's what the company pays it's lawyers for.

Outside of that use case if you're worried about somebody stealing your laptop and getting your data, encrypt your boot partition and any other storage with your secrets on it.
Lock it as soon as you leave your desk. Power It Off as soon as you're done working etc etc
If somebody steals it you don't heed to remotely wipe it.

This was for invoicing one of the big three auto manufacturers

As with any other coding project the computer science part of it was the comparatively easy part
Correctly understanding the requirements, in this case properly interpreting the contracts and regulations... not so easy

of their precious bodily fluids

ublock*
Stupid voice to text