Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Thanks for pointing out the "briefly" part. (Score 1) 461

by Ferrofluid (#47320089) Attached to: Half of Germany's Power Supplied By Solar, Briefly

It ain't that easy to throw away 25Mw of generation at the drop of a hat

Why can't you just disconnect some fraction of the solar panels? Just run them as open circuits.

But I agree that underproduction is much more difficult to deal with than overproduction. The only practical solution I know of is to use some sort of energy storage system like pumped water storage, batteries (e.g. vanadium redox), or, and I'm speculating here, possible next-generation graphene ultracapacitors.

Comment: Re:Mapping the Nematode? (Score 2, Insightful) 44

by Ferrofluid (#47276461) Attached to: First Movie of an Entire Brain's Neuronal Activity

You look for cellular activities which correspond to cancerous behavior, and when you see them, you tell that cell to kill itself

That's kind of what's already supposed to happen naturally inside the human body. Cells are supposed to kill themselves if they are severely malfunctioned or are likely to become cancerous. However, if enough of these fail-safe mechanisms are damages within a cell, then that cell becomes cancerous. That's why cancer is so difficult to treat, and why your own immune system has difficulty attacking it -- the cancer cells have gone rogue and are no longer "following orders" to kill themselves.

So, if you were able to insert genes into cells, which would allow the cells to kill themselves upon activation by a certain light wavelength, then what would happen? Say you illuminate the tumour with that particular wavelength. Perhaps 99.9% of the cells will undergo apoptosis, as instructed. But maybe 0.1% acquired a mutation which disabled your fail-safe genes. Now what? Congratulations -- the cancer has now evolved to be resistant to your light-induced apoptosis commands. And you're back to square one.

Comment: Why is it lit from the side? (Score 1) 29

The article says that these images are produced from radar scans. Why, then, does the asteroid look like it's illuminated from the side? If the asteroid was "illuminated" with a radar beam from an earth-based antenna, while the reflected radar waves were also detected using earth-based dishes, then shouldn't the asteroid look like it's illuminated head-on? Am I missing something here?

Comment: Mouse Latency Issue? (Score 2) 187

by Ferrofluid (#47151849) Attached to: Windows 8.1 Finally Passes Windows 8 In Market Share

I read sometime last year that Windows 8.1 introduced a bug related to mouse latency, which was especially noticeable for gamers using high-dpi mice. Apparently, many games became unplayable because of the greatly increased mouse lag. Microsoft issued a temporary "fix" (patch KB2908279), which from what I've read only corrected the issue for a few specific games -- i.e., it was not a true, universal fix. Does anyone know if they have finally fixed this issue? I've been holding off from upgrading to Windows 8.1 for this very reason.

+ - Slashdot Beta: Because They Hate You 3

Submitted by boolithium
boolithium (1030728) writes "People on here are missing the point of the Beta roll out. The elimination of the existing user base is not a side effect, it is a feature. Slashdot as a brand has value, but as a site has limited commercial appeal. The users are the kids at the lunch table, where not even the foreign exchange students want to sit. Nobody ever got laid from installing NetBSD.

Once they are finished with their nerd cleansing, they can build a new Slashdot. A sexier Slashdot. A Slashdot the kids can dance to.

They aren't ignoring you. They are exterminating you."

The biggest difference between time and space is that you can't reuse time. -- Merrick Furst

Working...