Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?
Take advantage of Black Friday with 15% off sitewide with coupon code "BLACKFRIDAY" on Slashdot Deals (some exclusions apply)". ×

Comment Re:quite likely "intelligence" is monitoring (Score 1) 318

Find what? This is propaganda channels and not secret information channels. It's like the Nazis in WW2 would eagerly collect the British "what your wife is doing at home while you are away to fight this war" pamphlets in order to collect vital intelligence information on the allied war effort. The ISIL Twitter accounts serve no purpose what so ever for intelligence agencies.

Comment Re:Guarantee (Score 1) 214

Granted, however there is probably just as much if not more closed project dying the vary same death inside companies, of course they are used only for internal stuff. In every workplace that I have been to there has always been the "this system we do not ever touch because no one knows what it does or how it works, but it does". And the source of most of these projects are also long gone, a situation that we at least don't have with the open projects.

Comment Re:Guarantee (Score 1) 214

Yes there is the code of their paying customers but they would get no where as a startup without access to the great wealth of open source code, and while they are closed source themselves they have somewhat paid back by reporting the bugs they found to each project.

Comment Re:Here come the anti-American twits (Score 1) 428

Yes we don't observer, we celebrate. As I wrote there is even a special cake that you eat to celebrate the death of Gustavus Adolphus. Other deaths are observed or commemorated depending upon the person or situation but Gustavus Adolphus in particular is celebrated.

Comment Re:Here come the anti-American twits (Score 1) 428

It's a culture difference that probably is very hard for foreigners to understand but we Swedes tend to "celebrate" military losses and deaths of kings. Mostly celevrated is the deaths of Gustaf II Adolf (which is his Swedish name) and King Charles XII both in November (the 6th and the 30th). Our biggest military failure, which is the Wasa Ship which sank at it's christening, is something that we are wery proud of and display in a museum :)

We hade one "incident" on a prior workplace where we had a French CEO visiting on the 6th of November and when he noticed that every one where eating a special cake (as one does in the memory of Gustaf II Adolf) or own CEO then said "we celebrate that the Germans killed our king", the french guy looked like he was on candid camera or something :-D

Comment Re:Guarantee (Score 1) 214

If you don't think that Open Source software have bugs fixed by people all over the world right now "to a significant extent" you must be living in denial. Granted it does not happen to 100% of all projects but if a product is running FLOSS you can be sure to a big percentage that there is some one else hacking it.

Comment Re:CVS or Subversion (Score 1) 325

Version bumps only happen if you insist on putting several project into the same repository. And even then you can get per project version in "svn info" and "svn log" (and probably via other means as well).

As to your second statement, what? Please explain because that is nothing that I have ever seen after using SVN for decades.

Comment Re:CVS or Subversion (Score 1) 325

What Linus did say about SVN was exactly this:

When I say I hate CVS with a passion, I have to also say that if there any SVN users (Subversion users) in the audience, you might want to leave. Because my hatred of CVS has meant that I see Subversion as being the most pointless project ever started, because the whole slogan for the Subversion for a while was 'CVS done right' or something like that. And if you start with that kind of slogan, there is nowhere you can go. It's like, there is no way to do CVS right.

Which is what I have said consistently in each post. Then he talks about branching and merging which is a huge pain in CVS, a fact that no one argues. In fact it's one of the main reasons that SVN was created in the first place. So no that does not apply to SVN as well. And finally he talks about using SCM in a distributed model which is completely uninteresting for what we argue (since the project in TFS is not distributed and that no one here have argued that SVN would be a preferred choice in a distributed project).

So no I actually think that it's you who don't really understand what you saw and heard, you don't like SVN and that bias made you interpret his talk in a different way than what he actually said. Nothing strange about that, it's just the way the human mind works.

Comment Re:CVS or Subversion (Score 1) 325

Because of the "CVS done right" yes, not because he actually have used or even tried SVN. When you see or read what Linus says you have to first understand that he is very satirical most of the time. I know that this is a foreign concept to many people (mostly Americans) but this is very common among the Nordic countries (from which Linus orginates).

Nothing will ever be attempted if all possible objections must be first overcome. -- Dr. Johnson