So people realised it's more convenient to have phone functionality in their tablet, and total tablet market has grown, according to these stats. Sure, some people find it convenient to separate the two, but what's the point? Does a tablet/phone have a different effect on the "post-PC" world than a tablet without phone functionality?
Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).
In the digital world, stores enforce my nationality. I can order a music CD or a movie on DVD from Amazon.com, but if I want to buy digital music or stream a digital movie I can't. The more we move towards digital content the more borders there are, paradoxically.
I would hazard a guess that you didn't look at the list of best selling PC games in that report.
There's indeed a chance that female gamers spend less than male gamers per game on average, but I'm sure that even if that's the case it's nothing like what you state.
Even if you go by stereotypes, Candy Crush Saga is estimated to make $1m per day and the Sims franchise has always been a PC best seller.
Kind of silly to say that there can be various definitions and you don't care, then act as if there's one single definition that's being violated.
"Gamer" is associated with people who spend most of their time playing games inside their mancave.
Don't you mean "in their parents' basement?"
Sure, if you limit the definition to men then by that definition only men can be gamers. If you define by game time, I'm sure women will still have a good representation.
I assume that by "we" you mean "cynics".
I do think it's news for nerds, but I'm more saddened by the death of Jay Lake this month, just before his 50th birthday.
... shut down its comments section.
Not sure what you're talking about, I always found Mario Kart Wii to be easy. How hard can the controls be, you mostly just use the wheel and occasionally activate a boost. Then again, I don't remember blue turtle shells so maybe I'm missing something.
Back to the point, as I said frustration leading to anger is not something which needs research, it's very easy to see on my 4 year old. To quote the BBC article about the research we're talking about "one recent study suggested that playing violent video games for long periods of time can hold back the "moral maturity" of teenagers." (To clarify, the BBC is talking about another research, not the one we're talking about, but it was in an article about that) Which goes back to what I said: one things which could be studied is how players of violent gamer deal with frustration compared to other players and non-players.
... is linked to insults, not abuse when growing up.
I won't repeat everything I posted elsewhere, but really, that's the stupidest research I've heard of in a long time. First of all, starting with calling a version of Half Life 2 where enemies evaporate "non-violent". So, if there's no blood it's not violence? If you just disintegrate people that's a non-violent game? That's such a basic problem with definitions that I feel that the researchers should be taken out and evaporated non-violently.
Then there's the conclusion. Sure, people can get angry when they are frustrated. You don't have to be a genius to know that. A more interesting question would be how well people deal with that frustration. Do players of violent game tend to have worse control of their temper in this respect than others? That would be more interesting than the stupid conclusions here.
(And I'd like to apologise to the researchers, I haven't read the research paper, just the articles on various sites, and it's possible that it's only the writers of these editorials who are jumping to conclusions. However I'm sure that the "non-violent Half life 2" is part of the original article, and as such I can believe that the rest of the stupidity also exists there.)
I don't know about trust. Bitcoin is a speculative market, and it will probably always be like that, because the characteristics of bitcoin make it a commodity and not money. I can't see it ever being used directly as money (i.e., without going through a "real" currency such as dollars).
If one side argues concept and the other argues implementation issues, they can easily both be right. Stross was wrong on several levels, but saying that he misses the point of the concept is the stupidest rebuttal one can make.
Right (and wrong, see below). This is a bad article by Network World, trying to frame this as crowdfunding, and bundling it with other crowdfunding news. It's possible that this is how IBM presented the subject to them, but I'd have liked a bit more critical thinking from the reporter.
The result is that most comments here make it clear that people didn't get what IBM did. To quote the relevant part of the article: "they were able to propose and fund projects designed to improve corporate culture and staff morale".
Where you're wrong is that it's not a survey or poll, because the suggestions come from the employees. That's where this scheme is better, because the company is saying "we're giving you a maximum of $50,000, what would you do with it?" rather than the higher ups providing the suggestions.
Googling for AMD dropping XP I found posts from October 2012 claiming the same thing: a driver came out with no XP support, end of the world is coming. I haven't been able to find anything official about AMD discontinuing XP support. Doesn't mean it doesn't exist, but I feel that a post will at least have a link to relevant proof. Linking to a beta driver as a form of proof just doesn't cut it IMO.
I haven't had problems with Windows for a long while (I'm on 7 now, but it was true for Vista too). It has the software I want and I'm used to using it.
I haven't tried Linux lately. When I did, it was a little bit of hell, closest in my experience to a beta of Vista. It didn't like my hardware, I had to edit text files to get it to work correctly on a second drive, installing a display driver was a bit of hell and killed the display, GUI programs silently failed, printing their errors only to a console,
That was maybe 3 years ago. I tried again later, and at least hardware-wise it was better, but the OS was still a little too rough. Perhaps these days the experience will be better, but I just don't have the time to waste on trying to get a non-Windows system to work just for the hell of it. Sure, I like alternative OS's, but I see no practical benefit for the switch and enough drawbacks.