Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Hahahaha! (Score 2) 564

by Dzimas (#43594365) Attached to: BlackBerry CEO: Tablet Market Is Dying
You seem a bit confused. Netflix decides what platforms they wish to support and are responsible for writing their own apps. They chose not to support the Playbook because the installed user base was extremely small compared to the Android and iOS ecosystems, not because RIM was "clueless." I suppose RIM could have paid a number of key developers (Instagram, Netflix, Skype) to release apps for the platform, but that sets a dangerous precedent and probably wouldn't have helped the product's sales. It's interesting to note that both Skype and Instagram are already supported by the new Blackberry BB10 phones.

Comment: Re: bets? (Score 1) 319

by Dzimas (#43574449) Attached to: $200 Intel Android Laptops Are Coming
Microsoft was recently charging OEMs $30 for Windows 8 and office on sub-10.8" touchscreen machines, and there were rumors of $20 licenses for touchscreen notebooks with 11.6" and smaller screens. However, $20 is a significant cost when you're trying to retail an inexpensive machine. It could force manufacturers to offer $279 windows machines with the same hardware specs as $199 android units.

Comment: Re:Kobo (Score 4, Interesting) 132

by Dzimas (#43501429) Attached to: Did B&N Pass On the 6.8" E-ink Screen That Kobo Snapped Up?
In Canada, Kobo has a much higher profile because their ereaders and tablets are marketed by Chapters Indigo, a major brick and mortar book chain. Kindle has made limited inroads here, and B&N doesnt have a physical presence to sell Nooks. The Kobo Arc tablet starts at $175 and is actually quite good (got my wife one for Christmas). The Kobo Glo and Kobo Mini ereaders were popular last Christmas, too. I don't think the company bought coverage, as others here suggest. I think they're just making an aggressive play to improve their ereaders for this fall.

Comment: Expensive when you're not in the USA... (Score 1) 363

by Dzimas (#43477603) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: What Magazines Do You Still Read?
I still receive the paper version of IEEE Spectrum. As a kid, I used to love reading Popular Science and Omni in the school library. My parents subscribed to a variety of magazines, but I didn't follow in their footsteps primarily because I lived in Canada, and subscriptions to American magazines cost more than twice as much as in the US. The discrepancy still exists today. Pop Sci costs $12/year in the US and $26 in Canada. The logical part of me understands that Canada doesn't have a heavily subsidized magazine postage rate, but the emotional side just gets angry when asked to pay twice as much for exactly the same product. That said, if prices were the same, I suspect I'd have let my subscription lapse years ago, anyway. Even though a well researched paper article is fun to read, nothing beats the immediacy of the web.

Comment: Re:Too little too late (Score 3, Informative) 628

by Dzimas (#43466663) Attached to: Windows 8.1 May Restore Boot-To-Desktop, Start Button
Brake is in the middle. The clutch is on the left. Otherwise you were sold an inferior vehicle.

Or perhaps I'm driving a Ford Model T. They sold millions of them with a brake on the right, reverse pedal in the middle, and the clutch on the left. The throttle lever is on the steering wheel.

Comment: Here's an article on the sorry state of Bolex SA (Score 2) 112

by Dzimas (#43364975) Attached to: Digital Bolex Gives You a Classic Film Look in a Digital Package (Video)
I spent a few years as a contributing editor and translator for Berlin-based smallformat (the English version of schmalfilm). It was extremely sad to see how the European movie camera manufacturers had been completely unable to competitively shift manufacturing to Asia when the electronic revolution started to take hold in the early 1980s - we basically lost AGFA (Germany) Eumig (Austria), Beaulieu (France) and even the once-might Bolex SA ended up as little more than a repair shop occupying a small part of their old office tower. Here's an article about a melancholy visit to Bolex in early 2005 (originally in German): http://schmalfilm-shop.schiele-schoen.de/115/8170/smf2050748/WHERE_THE_BOSS_OPENS_THE_DOOR.html

Comment: Re:Full Retard Mode Activate! (Score 1) 220

by Dzimas (#43354273) Attached to: Should the US Really Limit Chinese-Government Influenced IT Systems?
... And China's inflation rate is climbing, with food costs up about 6% since last year. Much as it's nice to tout blistering GDP growth, it carries significant inflationary risk. The more important question: "Can or should governments aim for perpetual economic growth?"

Comment: Re:Not the technology (Score 4, Insightful) 369

by Dzimas (#43271373) Attached to: FAA Pushed To Review Ban On Electronics
Having experienced a runway overshoot, the issue is that things tend to go flying around the cabin in a really nasty way, I don't want my teeth knocked out by the tablet that was previously sitting in the lap of the kid three rows in front of me. I don't want you to sit in the aisle seat in confusion because you missed the cabin crew's instructions while listening to your iPod at full volume. Stow your crap and clear your ears during the most dangerous part of the flight and make sure you know how many rows away the emergency exits are.

Comment: Re:the 90s are over, dad... (Score 1) 502

by Dzimas (#43266329) Attached to: Windows Blue 9364 Screenshots Show Feature Enhancements
Windows didn't hit its stride until the 2000s. Windows XP was released in October 2001, with great commercial success. As of last month, it was estimated to be running on almost 39% of PCs. That's a critical problem that Microsoft faced - instead of dutifully upgrading every couple of years, many people and businesses stayed on XP. Each subsequent release has tried to up the whizz-bang factor of the UI.

Comment: Re:Of course it serves a purpose (Score 1) 466

by Dzimas (#43206635) Attached to: Why Earth Hour Is a Waste of Time and Energy
You've missed the point completely. The purpose of Earth Hour is to make us realize how absolutely reliant on technology we are. No electric lights, no computers or phones and no television is a jarring shift for most urbanites. Turning your lights off isn't about raising awareness in others, it's about raising *your* awareness. Hopefully you do a little thinking and realize that (a) an emergency preparedness kit with food, flashlights, water and a few days worth of essential supplies is a very sharp idea in case of a disaster, (b) your house/apartment probably doesn't have an effective secondary heating system. Fix that. And, finally, (c) that we're bloody wasteful and should do something about it. Chances are that you won't get far with (c) because it's bloody hard to wean ourselves from our energy addiction, but you stand a reasonable chance of succeeding with (a) and (b).

Your computer account is overdrawn. Please reauthorize.

Working...