Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?

Comment: Re:Don't Have to Try Very Hard at All (Score 1) 184

by Dog-Cow (#49609655) Attached to: Two Gunman Killed Outside "Draw the Prophet" Event In Texas

No they don't. They are actually idolising Mohammed, which is exactly what they aren't supposed to do. I understand they don't see it that way, but they're unintelligent morons, so they can be forgiven that point.

Also, it's perfectly OK (according to the Old Testament) for non-Jews to worship idols. In fact, the fact that this occurred is a basic premise of much of the Old Testament, and never are the non-Jews admonished for it.

Comment: Re:Attacking me now are you? (Score 1) 184

by Dog-Cow (#49609633) Attached to: Two Gunman Killed Outside "Draw the Prophet" Event In Texas

Actually, you are wrong on practically every point. But, considering you have the intelligence of a 10-day old piece of shit, that's no surprise at all.

Calling someone's dad a poopy-head is not the same as yelling Fire! in a crowded venue. Drawing a picture of Mohammed is the former, not the latter.

Anytime your speech harms no one, but yields a response aimed to murder innocent people, you know you're right and the response is wrong.

Comment: Re:"xenophobic fascist" (Score 1) 184

by Dog-Cow (#49609607) Attached to: Two Gunman Killed Outside "Draw the Prophet" Event In Texas

I suppose it's not surprise to find you defending the intentions of the gunmen, considering you are one of the idiot shit-fucks who thinks a picture of a women's face is pornographic. Obviously, you have Islamic sympathies in your belief towards women. It's not much of a stretch to accept that you also believe in murdering people who don't follow your party's line.

Comment: Re: GIGO (Score 1) 69

by Dog-Cow (#49608725) Attached to: Microsoft's AI Judges Age From Snapshots, With Mixed Results

That's a ridiculous argument. Context matters. If you, viewing someone in person, have more context, it's not unreasonable to expect you to do better. The question you should be asking is: can you do better than the computer with just a photograph and no other knowledge?

I suspect the answer is yes, but for how long will that be true?

Comment: Re:Integrity (Score 1) 196

by Dog-Cow (#49605965) Attached to: Chrome Passes 25% Market Share, IE and Firefox Slip

Is it really of so little value that you care not a whit whether the data you received is identical to the data that was sent?

Yes. Take slashdot, for example. I don't give a flying fuck what the server sends, so long as it reads more-or-less like English (no, I am not new here), and is vagualy entertaining. HTTPS would be a waste for 99% of the site.

All programmers are playwrights and all computers are lousy actors.