You have been reading slashdot with blinders if you think this was ever such a place.
I also expect you to eat feces, but that doesn't make taking a dump wrong.
No they don't. They are actually idolising Mohammed, which is exactly what they aren't supposed to do. I understand they don't see it that way, but they're unintelligent morons, so they can be forgiven that point.
Also, it's perfectly OK (according to the Old Testament) for non-Jews to worship idols. In fact, the fact that this occurred is a basic premise of much of the Old Testament, and never are the non-Jews admonished for it.
Trolling on slashdot is fun. Trolling murderous fuck-whads so they can be eradicated is a favour to humanity.
Actually, you are wrong on practically every point. But, considering you have the intelligence of a 10-day old piece of shit, that's no surprise at all.
Calling someone's dad a poopy-head is not the same as yelling Fire! in a crowded venue. Drawing a picture of Mohammed is the former, not the latter.
Anytime your speech harms no one, but yields a response aimed to murder innocent people, you know you're right and the response is wrong.
The worshippers at the synagogue would call the police. In some, the worshippers might beat the crap out of the trespassers before calling the police. In any event, none would show up with guns, ready to shoot the violators.
I suppose it's not surprise to find you defending the intentions of the gunmen, considering you are one of the idiot shit-fucks who thinks a picture of a women's face is pornographic. Obviously, you have Islamic sympathies in your belief towards women. It's not much of a stretch to accept that you also believe in murdering people who don't follow your party's line.
If you think a mob is democratic, you know little of mob psychology.
The GP meant the VCs, not the employees. Don't you feel silly now?
Actually, you are clearly the illiterate, fucked-up moron here.
The GP's point was that the GGP's post was attached to a First Post!, with the clear intention of being a retard to get his post higher up in the post history.
I imagine the porn stars are trying to look underage. Is it the program's fault it doesn't have the larger context?
That's a ridiculous argument. Context matters. If you, viewing someone in person, have more context, it's not unreasonable to expect you to do better. The question you should be asking is: can you do better than the computer with just a photograph and no other knowledge?
I suspect the answer is yes, but for how long will that be true?
Is it really of so little value that you care not a whit whether the data you received is identical to the data that was sent?
Yes. Take slashdot, for example. I don't give a flying fuck what the server sends, so long as it reads more-or-less like English (no, I am not new here), and is vagualy entertaining. HTTPS would be a waste for 99% of the site.
Forgive them for being pragmatic instead of dogmatic. Forgive them for using a perfectly good browser that's preinstalled instead of wading into some obscure nerd-war against Microsoft. In other words, forgive them for being normal people.
Right. An adult would get jealous that his GF looked at another guy and proceed to beat the crap out of said other guy. You have a really warped view of "adult" behaviour, compared to your average teenager.