Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?
Slashdot Deals: Prep for the CompTIA A+ certification exam. Save 95% on the CompTIA IT Certification Bundle ×

Comment Re:Speed isn't Everything (Score 1) 67

I think the model like DSL service should be the one that municipal fiber follows -- the municipal fiber just provides the layer 2 connectivity and you choose which ISP you want.

If somebody wants to start a geek-centric service with static IPs and where technical support is limited to setting reverse DNS, great, they can buy a rack or whatever at the municipal fiber hosting center and sell that service to whoever's interested.

If Comcast or AOL or whoever wants to offer their mega-consumer focused service with dynamic IPs, webmail, coupon offers, ad-injection, great, they can lease a rack, too and sell that.

Plenty of cheapskates and technophobes will pick the consumer service for all the add-ons and technical support and the geeks willing to spend the same or just slightly more for static IP service with none of the bullshit can pick that.

There was a time where a company I knew set themselves up as an ISP choice for DSL. Employees could get DSL from the phone company, choose their employer as their ISP and they had basically a hardwired VPN to work (that solution has some issues in terms of personal-vs-work access, but IIRC from the network guy at that company I talked to they had an entirely separate Internet provider they routed that traffic over). I think whatever setup and operational cost was greatly mitigated by reduced costs related to remote access and the legion of VIPs who wanted their personal ISP bill reimbursed because that "expense" got taken care off at wholesale.

The analogy that makes the most sense is the roads. The city builds 'em, fixes 'em and sets some pretty basic usage rules, but you buy your transportation and delivery services from other companies. If I want a pizza, I pick whoever provides the pizza I want and they just use the road to get it to me.

Comment Re:Cop video storage is a moral hazard for Taser (Score 1) 77

I think it is worse -- when the police control it, the moral hazard and control issues are pretty obvious.

When a third party controls it, it's more opaque. The police have plausible deniability to say "But we use a third party vendor, we didn't delete that video." The fact that Taser has a financial relationship with police departments is much less clear (to the general public at least) and it's a lot less clear that Taser has a neutral motivation with regard to these videos.

To me, the solution should more likely be that some police oversight entity selects/approves/controls the video storage contract and probably should be contracting with a vendor who doesn't have a specific dependency on the police as a target market. That may be more difficult if regulations regarding these videos lend themselves to market specialization and you end up needing vendors who specialize in those markets.

You'll end up with a similar moral hazard, but at least you'll have reduced the amount of financial influence the police have over the vendors.

Comment Should they only be in the layer-2 business? (Score 2) 67

While I mostly think this is great, I wonder if they should be in the "business" of supplying actual layer-3 connectivity or whether they should just be maintaining the fiber plant and selling access to it to other companies willing to provide actual IP connectivity?

Maybe a purely internal municipal ISP makes sense for supplying IP connectivity to municipal offices, schools or other parts of the government.

The part that makes me kind of leery is the fact that the government is the ISP and this creates a certain conflict. Does the fact that the municipality runs it mean that the police have greater access to monitor the network or some increased motivation to use municipal control to go after "evildoers"?

It's not hard to see how this could also morph into the kind of local political control that those in power use to stay in power.

Comment Re:... less energy than a greenhouse (Score 1) 76

I'm not sure when greenhouses were meant to be net producers of energy.

I think their original purposes might have been:

1) growing things in climates that were otherwise too cold for them (where your energy "production") probably comes from. aka "the greenhouse effect" which I think in practice almost always has some kind of either supplementary heat (if its too cold outside for the sun to provide enough heat) or supplementary ventilation (to keep it from being too hot).

2) protect more sensitive plants from natural predators, weeds, etc -- like floral greenhouses

Comment Cop video storage is a moral hazard for Taser (Score 1) 77

Body cameras haven't been around long enough to really know whether they will be predominantly exculpatory for the police or provide evidence of misconduct.

But doesn't relying on a vendor who has a financial interest in continued sales to police organizations in charge of storing possible evidence of police misconduct create a significant moral hazard for Taser?

If they come to be seen as an organization "too cooperative" with enforcement of rules against police misconduct, doesn't this imperil their image with the police and potential sales of equipment to the police? It would seem this would provide them with a subtle pro-police bias which could undermine the entire point of video cameras from the public's perspective.

Comment Re:Not bad in principle (Score 1) 141

Reputation management also involves correcting widely-held beliefs about a company/organisation which are flat-out wrong. This happens more than you'd imagine, and work like urban legends - statements of dubious factual content passed around as gospel truth.

Then that's what you spend your marketing budget on. It does NOT mean you should hire an army of minimum wage sockpuppets to post phony reviews or pay media strategies companies to edit your Wiki page.

If you can't repair your image honestly, you're either not trying or you don't deserve the image you want. Social media did NOT change the rules. In fact, it may have made them more important than ever.

How often have you seen a Slashdot post condemn a company for something it hasn't done, only for that post to be modded +5 and accepted as an honest appraisal of said company?

In middle school, there was a guy who called me a bad name in front of a bunch of people. Everybody laughed, and it was the equivalent of a +5 mod. Through my behavior and speech, people soon realized it wasn't true. I did not hire 20 strangers to give testimony or to scream in the guy's face.

The last thing you want to do when a damaging falsehood about your company is spreading like wildfire across the internet is to sit there and do nothing, as that only guarantees it will continue unabated.

To paraphrase a famous politician, business ain't twiddlywinks. Bad PR is not an excuse for corporate dishonesty. I'm sorry, it's just not.

Comment Fourth grade my fuzzy ass (Score 2) 514

Apparently this dummy, Olga Khazan (if that is indeed her real name) doesn't realize that there's a difference between "hating math" and not knowing any math beyond that taught in the 4th grade. Shit, I hated math, but I went through Calculus and Real Analysis. Then I married a mathematician so that I could get my partial differential equations solved via the bonds of matrimony. You know, whenever the need arises.

If you don't know basic algebra, you're not going to code for shit. It's like that Republican legislator from Arizona, Al Melvin, who believes that doing math with letters instead of numbers is a liberal conspiracy.

If you can't do that liberal math with letters instead of numbers, you can't code for shit.

Comment Re:The problem is people will comment on the bad. (Score 2) 141

I guess human nature varies. If I'm not 100% satisfied at a restaurant, I'll generally chalk it up to them having an off day. I might tell the proprietor, but I'm not gonna go rant on Yelp. If I have a really nice meal, I'll go give a good review. It's sort of the YMMV approach.

I'm generally not much for bad reviews, just as I very seldom mod any comments down. I'm a believer in the carrot over the stick.

Comment Re:Three main types of bad jobs. (Score 5, Interesting) 408

Basically tech jobs are closer to blue collar than white collar

A peer and I once made the same comparison. We called ourselves digital maintenance men, because by and large that's what it is.

I've never worked for a company that had a significant manufacturing component, but I kind of wonder how the blue/white collar split works there for the people who setup, maintain and manage seriously complicated factory systems. I think they might have been called millwrights at one time.

Are they treated like blue collar people (probably, if the job involves any serious mechanical tools), or because of the sophistication of the equipment (all computer driven and complicated) are they treated like dirt, like other blue collar jobs, with all the usual management/labor hostility, clock punching, etc.

And why do "office" jobs seem to escape a lot of that labor/management hostility? Even the lowly marketing associate seems to get treated better than the most skilled blue collar worker. I've known some electricians who were really intelligent and used to sort out cabling issues in my data center better than I could, even though he didn't know how to configure the equipment. He'd make suggestions via some kind of intuition that never dawned on me.

Somebody ought to cross ball point pens with coat hangers so that the pens will multiply instead of disappear.