You can't show content in a hologram that is deeper than the projector... It's physically impossible to do this. Now if you could show a different image to each eye, you could potentially trick the eye into focusing as if the content was really X-Y feet away. Stereoscopy has a hope of trying to solve this eventually. Holograms are never going to solve their depth problem.

Most of the 3D live action movies in the US have been 3D conversions. Look for "filmed in 3D" as an advertising tagline to know that it's actually a 3D movie and not a half-assed conversion (hint, there's not many... Tron, Avatar, and some of the stuff not yet out). All 3D animation is fine in 3D. Alice, Clash of the Titans, Green Hornet, Last Airbender, etc: all trash conversions.

As a user of Adobe Photoshop who switched to GIMP, Hooray! However, as a user of Lightwave who tried switching to Blender... Yuck, Blender sucks.

http://www.vnews.com/sexcrimes/recidivism.htm The rates are not as high as people assume.

No, it seems that's always been done. It does seem like they're more likely to confirm the accusation in the denial now though...

"Contrary to recent reports in the media, BT's Content Connect service will not create a two-tier internet, but will simply offer service providers the option of differentiating their broadband offering through enhanced content delivery,"

Or in other words:

"Contrary to recent reports in the media, BT's Content Connect service will not create a two-tier internet, but will simply [add a second tier of] content delivery,"

PC dictates we can't examine personality and mental differences by race because a bunch of racists in the early 20th century published a bunch of white-supremicist drivel under the banner of science. I personally wonder how in particular generations of slavery affected the african-american population.

Bull with it's balls cut off = cow

Spiders are bugs. They're not insects.

Here's what actually happened: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/35d6244c-d9fa-11df-bdd7-00144feabdc0.html

That seems like a reasonable and fair idea, however, I think you need to take at such a rate that you are actually encouraging better standards. Taxes that are too low just become a money siphon without properly discouraging improved behavior.