Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

+ - Sourceforge staff takes over a user's account and wraps their software installer-> 11

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes: Sourceforge staff took over the account of the GIMP-for-Windows maintainer claiming it was abandoned and used this opportunity to wrap the installer in crapware. Quoting Ars:

SourceForge, the code repository site owned by Slashdot Media, has apparently seized control of the account hosting GIMP for Windows on the service, according to e-mails and discussions amongst members of the GIMP community—locking out GIMP's lead Windows developer. And now anyone downloading the Windows version of the open source image editing tool from SourceForge gets the software wrapped in an installer replete with advertisements.


Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:Such is C (Score 1) 264

by Cow Jones (#49636365) Attached to: C Code On GitHub Has the Most "Ugly Hacks"

What I remember is that it featured a rather eye-watering construction of two overlapping switch statements (?) which was syntactically legal, but perhaps shouldn't have been.

Reminds me of this monstrosity. It's not two overlapping switch statements, but a switch entangled with a do ... while loop. If that sounds familiar, you may be able to find your code from the links in the External References section.

CJ

Comment: Re:IPv6 Addresses (Score 2) 305

by Cow Jones (#47217939) Attached to: When will large-scale IPv6 deployment happen?

I don't think that's a viable solution to the OP's issue ("IPv6 addresses are so long that you can't remember them"). From the RFC:

For example, consider the address shown above
1080:0:0:0:8:800:200C:417A
...
Then, when encoded as specified above, this becomes:
4)+k&C#VzJ4br>0wv%Yp

It's shorter, yes, but much harder to memorize. Especially when this address can be abbreviated to
1080::8:800:200C:417A

The author's views about his suggestion's efficiency are also... interesting:

Many current processors do not find 128 bit integer arithmetic, as
required for this technique, a trivial operation. This is not
considered a serious drawback in the representation, but a flaw of
the processor designs.

So, humans don't find this format easy to deal with, and neither do machines.

Comment: Re:In Plain English: Security Crap (Score 5, Interesting) 54

by Cow Jones (#46768247) Attached to: All Packages Needed For FreedomBox Now In Debian

$ curl -s https://pagekite.net/pk/ |sudo bash

I've noticed this kind of crap more and more often lately, usually as one of the "preferred" methods of installation for projects on GitHub. Who in their right mind would run that? There's a reason why we have package systems and a method of signing said packages. Blindly trusting some website with root shell access... boggles my mind.

Comment: Re:In plain English, what's a FreedomBox? (Score 2) 54

by Cow Jones (#46768151) Attached to: All Packages Needed For FreedomBox Now In Debian

Easy my ass. GP is absolutely correct, they completely fail to give a summary of what a FreedomBox is and why we should care. I've read those pages you linked and there is no summary. The closest thing I could find are links to video presentations with titles like "FreedomBox Update", "FreedomBox 1.0" and "Freedom, out of the box!".

Comment: Re:"To Stop Fracking"? (Score 1) 317

by Cow Jones (#46326561) Attached to: Exxon Mobile CEO Sues To Stop Fracking Near His Texas Ranch

This comment on the Daily Kos article contains a very clear explanation of the Halliburton loophole.

Haliburton Loophole: No such thing.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/P...

Thanks for the link. The passage you apparently missed is on page 694 (sec 322).

CJ

"Love may fail, but courtesy will previal." -- A Kurt Vonnegut fan

Working...