I didn't have "learning that someone on Slashdot believes that the Cold War was a myth" on my bingo card for today.
That's not even vaguely what I said, so it's unclear if this is some kind of language issue or the result of a disability, but I'm just feeling worse and worse for you. You somehow believe the cold war was about communism?
On that note, anyone need GLIDE 3D, lol. 3dfx joke, nVidia won that war.
I'd say Microsoft won that war, and everyone else lost.
You seem to be confusing "wanting to get rid of communists" with "wanting their countries to be poor and dangerous".
Wow, I had no idea you were dumb enough to fall for the Red Scare.
It's quite amusing that some troll follows me around modding down any comments where I suggest humans should cooperate with one another. They are literally proving my point by moving things backwards with their solitary cowardice.
It's a competitive system, and you have to maintain certain level of merit and academic progress.
That it's a competitive system is the problem. The world advances through cooperation.
Good job doubling down when called out on your horrific and stupid "joke"
You seem to have forgotten we have read your comments.
Done here.
Good. Fuck off and don't come back, hypocrite.
What on Earth are you talking about? Nobody is trying to make other countries poor and dangerous.
I see that you are ignorant of the USA's entire history in Central and South America. This is my surprised face.
"The chances of someone being born with excellent skills is equal everywhere"
This is a nice rhetorical assertion, and one I'd like to agree with, but it's (unfortunately, for both the skilled and those in less advanced areas) provably false.
Skill directly correlates to IQ at a population level. The IQ of European-native peoples, Chinese, Japanese, and Jewish peoples is in the 100-105 range average. Africa, India, and the Middle East (to a lesser degree)? Not true at all. A full SD or more different. You've got a huge problem with inbreeding throughout India and the Middle East, for instance. This means that your average person is not going to have the same chance of being "born with excellent skills".
Of course, this is also not without discounting things like upbringing and environment, and it undoubtedly has some play in the matter.
As for this policy, it has absolutely nothing to do with letting the best and brightest immigrate. It's clearly reactionary due to unfettered refugees and other unskilled immigrants who can't speak the language, don't want to speak the language, and bring obscene levels of crime to what would otherwise be an idyllic socialist utopia.
In what ways do you find it superior?
For me, Grok has been pretty consistent at making some pretty wild code recommendations and not following specifications.
It's not like Gemini, which will get stuck implementing things and then get into a histrionic panic loop, but it's not nearly as good as gpt5.1 in implementing correct, complete code per specification.
Hahahahaha you think nationalists care about people other than themselves hahahhahahahahhahaha
You mean unlike a congressional parasite, or a PPP parasite, or a CEO parasite?
Use preview.
No, every day now.
More people fail every day.
Unsustainable means it fails eventually, not on a specific day.
"the proper solution is obviously to have a formal, controlled, actually viable work visa system for economic migrants"
Yes, we should definitely formalize and legalize our tampering with other countries to produce cheap labor we can abuse.
Wait, what?
and you make a lame joke out of a copy paste editor error we all saw and ignored.
Don't be mad because you didn't see it.
Also, don't call them "editors"
For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong. -- H. L. Mencken
