Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Nonsense: C++ standard limerick

Comments Filter:
  • ever read that far into the document before you!

    Congratulations.

  • I, for one, welcome our poetic overlords. (Really)

    Sorry.

  • I still don't have a copy, though I've wanted one. I found a cheap distributor in ANSI, but the EULA for it is incredibly restrictive. Under a strict enough reading, you can't even put the damned thing on a flash drive.

  • ...the rest of that paragraph (that precedes your quoted sentence), when I discovered the rest of the paragraph was actually all one sentence!

    The placement of explicit specialization declarations for function templates, class templates, member functions of class templates, static data members of class templates, member classes of class templates, member class templates of class templates, member function templates of class templates, member functions of member templates of class templates, member functions

    • by Chacham (981)

      Heh, when i showed it to a friend this morning, he made the same comment. :)

There is no distinction between any AI program and some existent game.

Working...