it doesn't want even the slightest risk of China's having access to private information.

If engineers in Beijing had access to their databases for several months, that's not "the slightest risk". That's a virtual certainty this information is now in the hands of the Chinese Government. I mean, come on, if Google was doing work to support China's "Social Credit" system I'd fully expect the five eyes to have ten copies by lunchtime. What, are we supposed the believe the Chinese Government is somehow less likely to spy that our own?

You're not an American, so it's not a shock that any number of terrorism-related American deaths is no big deal to you. However, those of us that are Americans, or even just live here, would like to keep the number as low as possible. What we do to effect this will not be dictated to us by someone who sits on their hands while thousands of inbred, third-world savages rape a million little girls because you're so terrified that someone might think you're a racist if you do anything about it. Fuck you and your cowardice, you disgusting piece of shit.

Found the Indian.

"Stagnate" in this context means "reached 30 years of age."

Mean words are literally the same as being responsible for tens of millions of deaths, as well as all of war's other attendant horrors, so it's an apt comparison.

The posts were timestamped within minutes of each other, say the exact same thing, and use the exact same writing style. So sorry you couldn't find work as a programmer because you suck at it. Pretty soon you won't even have your current shill job, because it will be automated by a bash script. At that point you'll just have to suck even more cock in truck stop bathrooms. Have fun dying of AIDS. :D

Reminded me of that Mitch Hedberg bit about filling out a form with only Yes or No checkboxes, and one of the questions was "Have you ever tried sugar or PCP?"

It's actually not surprising at all that someone with an agenda to push will ignore reality when it hinders the narrative, which is a fairly frequent occurrence.

And here you are, literally replying to yourself as if you were two different people. Kill yourself, please.

From TFS:

Better luck next time.

While the bold text is really convincing and completely negates the instruction of every English teacher on Earth, you forgot the link to the blog that was using other blogs as citations. As for "valid singular pronouns", we have "one": "When one is cold one might shiver." We also have "it", though it's generally not used in reference to people, unless, of course, you keep your victims at the bottom of a hole in your basement floor. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

True, but that's always been an incorrect use of "they". The correct pronoun would be "he", "she", or "he or she" (pick whichever one you want). If you really wanted to use "they" anyway the sentence would be, "When people are cold they might shiver."

Good to know that even a drooling simpleton like you can find work, even if it is just shitposting on /. for Zuckerberg and Nadella for six dollars an hour. God bless America.

Oh, look, an AC code.org shill. The most pathetic part is that you're not even good at it. Your only argument is to pretend that anyone who objects to foisting a bullshit agenda onto schoolchildren must be "a protectionist fuckwit" or "shitty programmer". Come back when you have a retort that's a bit more sophisticated than some dreary-ass argumentum ad hominem. In the meantime, go punch your mother in the face for raising a fucking retard.

Nobody said anything of the sort, but go ahead and continue throwing a tantrum because somebody on /. isn't drinking your employer's Kool-Aid.