Not likely to be white in that area of Philly. Still racist are racist
Its a shit area? Oh I mean, its a shit area!
I dare you to go sit around where the idiot left the robohiker in philly.
Yeah they left this thing in a shaddy area on purpose. They new it would get jacked. What brain surgeon left a silly looking pos on the side of a road in a place the redidents are unlikely to be going more then several blocks from their homes. Look up the address on a crime map. Its the freaking hood. Left in shit paris or montreal area same would happen.
They did this to disprove the company claims. Can't very well follow scientific method to disprove a claim unless you do the test that is directly related to the claim.
Some of that might be true. But Qwest Nanjo did some illegal financial shit for sure.
Oh if I am being an ass so what. We are talking about fire and people lives. 1% reduction in safety is to much for people already risking their lives.
Yeah brain surgeon did you read that the pilots last job should be trying to see an 18in square thing while trying to line up a run on a fire? The elevation of that run is whatever it HAS to be. So what pilot should have to waste time re align path take out drone then circle back to make its run? You don't understand the process do you?
What you can't see you can't avoid and what you aren't in control of can avoid you. So drone is above flight path gets sucked down. See how that's a problem. I thought this site was for people who knew shit like math and physics. Pilot should 100% not be having to watch out for drones while navigating a helicopter in a fire zone.
People trust police where you live?
Using an axe to get in no less.
Yeah I'm sure they can come up with a solution. The law isn't going to stop drone dicks. Its not even going to make is possible to destroy them with any kind of ease. What it does is protect fire fighters who, when able, can destroy them from being sued by the pin heads flying them.
Yes because everyone wants a performance self driving car. There are easily enough car enthusiasts while a minority to make mandated self driving unlikely.
why do you need an individual car? You do realize that pretty much they have said it a long way out for driverless cars being main stream. like 20-30 years. Thats just MIT though what do they know.
And anyone who likes driving will hope that day never comes. Sure self driving but eliminating driving. No thanks.