because 2 so called PhD's say it isn't a solution, that definitly means it isn't a solution... NOT!
How many times have we seen so called PhD's not agreeing with each other even after a huhum 'good study'..
Because those 2 couldn't figure it out, doesn't mean it isn't possible...

They can't even find all the living organisms on this planet or in our own solar system, or even know how our own galaxy is even created, and they think they know only 10% of all galaxies have 'complex life' as on earth? Please get real.. We're not even a spec in our own galaxy, and I'm very confidend that in our own galaxy there are more 'complex life' out there than 10%.. let alone the much MUCH bigger galaxies...

yeah, but by the time you have decend hydrogen stations where you can actually refill your car, the electric cars already have new batteries that have the same mileage with a fuelingtime of a few minutes.. And let's not forget, hydrogen isn't the safest fuel there is, but I would assume those tanks are safer than regular gasolinetanks...

We don't need no stinking permission from NASA to mine any moon or asteroid...

And he calls himself a professor? I guess he's way off base..
Smarter as us doesn't mean it has to understand what it's talking about (most politicians don't know jack what they are talking about and still they 'make' the rules)..
And let's not forget, with neural networks, AI can advance much faster than a regular person, and also let's not forget, there are way more advanced projects going on in laboratories than IBM's Watson, which haven't been shown to the public.. IBM's Watson is just the tip of the iceberg..
I sometimes wonder how these "professors" got their degree, sometimes I just wonder if those positions come with a box of cereal...

it just means they didn't have the right people doing the project....... And having money doesn't mean you can 'invent' something. Sometimes it's just the pennyless loner that invents the holy grail, not a well funded science team.. A lot of times those teams are held back by their fixed thinking...

I never understood why they placed the home/back buttons in newer releases in the middle of the screen, it just didn't make any sense.. How hard was it to even think about larger tablets or have people being able to choose the position..
For me, with every new incarnation of any OS, it seems to get more stupid and babylike interface..

Well, the people publishing those video's on youtube are the ones that are the biggest hypocrits on the planet..
And even if it was recorded by a police officer, doesn't mean you can just publish the video without consent of the people being filmed, especially if there is a commercial reason for publishing it.. and certainly in this case there seems to be a commercial reason..
Well, why not follow these people who post these video's and post their lives when they are not at their best on youtube, I guess then they would scream and cry themselves...

Cool, so you admit that US law also shouldn't go beyond their own borders, even though the US wants the rest of the world to obey their laws outside the US..

It's not like the US hasn't got their secret crap up there... So it's ver hypcritical to judge the russians...

Now you can just close the curtain if you don't want to look outside, but with this system it's not possible.. And what about if you're affright of heights, great ride then... Problem with this is, yes it might be fun for some, but it might be terror for others.. Personally I think I wouldn't like it to see the sky/ground like this all around me when I have to sit for 11 hours.. Yes it might be fun for a few minutes..

If they reject your app, they can tell you exactly why they reject it.. So why the F don't they do it, it's just ridiculous not to tell the exact reason..

I really don't like the new UI PC Settings, it's missing about every option one might need to control, at least if you are even a bit serious about configuring your PC..
Just keep the old screen for people who know what they are doing, and the other crap for people who actually never have to use it...

But these aren't photo's, these are drawings.. Yes in regard to real photo's it should always be illegal, but where do we draw the line with fiction..
It's illegal to kill a person, but yet we can draw it, we can watch movies where people kill, we can even play computer games doing it, but oh no then it's no problem.. But ooohhhh, it's a drawn (or rendered) picture of a ficticious young looking person, who the F cares, as long as no real person is used and hurt then people can do whatever they want if I'm concerned..
It's the persons who make real childporn and abuse real children that should be caught and punished... But then again, there are enough countries where it's no problem to marry and rape (oh sorry I mean consumate the marriage) a 9 year old....
It's all just a bunch of f-ing hypocrits....
It's just like the americans, oh no problem to show blood and mayhem on tv, but oh as soon as only a partial nipple is seen then the shit hits the fan.......

This is when people just go too far.. It's a f-ing drawing, it's not real..
This just tells me the people who made these laws are really in need of some psychotherapie if they think these drawings should be forbidden.. What's next, put people in jail just for what they are thinking?