great, another one of those wannabe languages.. There are already a lot of other alternatives out there..
Just use one of the classic languages with the same libraries as this one uses, you'll be glad you did..

I don't understand why intel removed some nice features from the more expensive ones, maybe the extra features are in the way for overclocking? Not that I really need those features as they are more for remote usages..
Or what are the advantages of the extra features which the K series is missing?

well, since it's your original work, it shouldn't be hard to show the original and the contract of the original client. Also you propably would be able to use that specific client as a reference..
But then again, there are a lot of frauds out there using other people's work to get ahead... but a lot of people are also using the internet as a source for helping them get the job done, which also means a lot of code will look a lot like each other as people are using the same forums/sites for help..

Yeah, because opensource never have any security holes, and they always fix it immediatly.. think again...

This moron should have reported the bug first to MS and later publish it, it would have the same effect.. Now MS doesn't have a chance to even fix the security in a timely fashion (you do know fixes have to be tested thoroughly which takes time, windows is not your simple hello world application)..
I do agree that it's not acceptable to let customers wait until the next patch-tuesday if you already have a decend fix ready..

it all depends on what is used to generate the electricity.. one big cole-plant is easier to replace than millions of little poluting devices.. so we really need to start replacing those little machines assoon as possible.. electricity can be generated with non polluting and endless ways...

but the prius isn't an all electric car, it does have a 'combustion-engine' on board... (except forcthe latest all electric prius, but that one is new and the prius model you refer to)

I agree with you completely, it's the most ridiculous name for a 3rd generation console.. They should fire the people who came up with that name..

how about sueing the company which claim to have ip about the virus, as they claim it's theirs, so they are therefor responsible for it, which makes them liable for any result the virus brings....

Yet another programming language for lazy developers.....
There are already too many flavors of developmentlanguages, everybody wants his/hers to prevail and is trying to come up with reasons why their language is better.. stop this BS.. looking at a lot of those 'spinoff' languages I mostly see stuff added in comparison to the 'standard-languages' which are clearly for lazy developers who don't know (or want to know) what they are doing.. And in the end all we end up with are slower applications even though our hardware is getting faster and faster, but due to the slow applications we hardly notice it when we upgrade hardware and software.. A great example is Android, when ported to C# (which already is also a 'slower' language/compiler as using real native compilation without a .NET framework) it was about 40%!!!! faster on average, which would mean an older device would run the same stuff just as good as a newer device with the current android, something tell's me it's a waste of my money to buy a faster device..
but then again, there are enough people who just don't give a damn..

I agree raiding his house was too much, but he shouldn't have published the book without permission.. What the publisher should have done is ask the teacher to remove the book (even though it's propably too late anyway, but raiding his house doesn't help there either).. But we don't know if the publisher did indeed first ask the teacher to remove it, and maybe he might have just refused to do it, and therefore the house was raided (in that case the raid was IMHO ok (if no violence was used))..

And how do we know this really is created by microsoft? It is true what the ad says, but I'm very hassitant to believe this is created by MS just because someone on the internet says so.. Unless MS confirms it, I'm gonna go with it being created by someone outside of MS without the knowledge of MS and is using MS for his/her 15 minutes of fame..

i can't agree more with you, having updated my ubuntu from 12.04 to 12.10 and i had some weird problems, finally had them resolved, i got another question to upgrade to 13.04... i should have never said yes, and another shitload of problems arose.. now i almost fixed it, but even with trying to develop through linux (because ther still isn't a windows sdk released yet), i have also run into a lot of problems trying to get it running.. so people claiming linux is better than windows(for people who don't live and breath linux) should just get their head out of their ass.. Yes it's much better as a few years ago, but it still has a long way before being as userfriendly as windows (although windows 8 is imho going steps back in being userfriendly)... I've been using windows since 3.0 and never had this much problems with just updating through the standard update mechanism..

Oh, that just the biggest fail.. do it right the first time What is right? So everything you write NOW will be looked at upon in a couple of years just the same why didn't he do it right the first time?
Specifications and technologies change over time.

Well.. 'Best coding practices' is all in the eye of the beholder.. what one calls best practice might look awfull to another.. there really is no 'best coding practices'..

What a moron is this stallman. Having DRM baked in 'HTML5' is exactly what it needs to get even more aproval and usage, otherwise plugins like flash and silverlight will still be needed.. The advantage of having it standarized in 'HTML5' is that plugins aren't needed anymore so every platform can use it. It's not like you HAVE to use DRM as a webdeveloper.. Otherwise you can also say that stuff like webworkers and videotags should also be excluded from the 'HTML5' standard.

DRM is sadly needed because tons of people are too lame to just pay for content they 'enjoy', in the end all you get it 'america funniest homevideo' like content if nobody pays or you'll end up with 2 hour long commercials..

What real reason would there be for not including a possibility for using DRM, as other unnecessary JUNK has already been approved for the 'HTML5' standard.. As I said, no webdeveloper who doesn't want to use DRM will have any problem with it, and webdevelopers who do need to use DRM (for whatever reason) can use it without the pain of having to resort to external plugins which are not available on a lot of platforms these days (flash for instance isn't available on android anymore (unless you already installed it, but even then a browser like chrome doesn't support it)).