EMI and Zenph are two different animals altogether. If I remember correctly EMI creates new music in the style of a composer based on a database of the composers work. The Zenph technique currently takes existing recordings of musicians, analyzes the music, and essentially turns that into a MIDI file. Hopefully when played on an acoustic instrument that's been modified to play MIDI the result sounds as close to the original as possible.

At the moment all it can do is recreate what has already been done. As for what they intend to do in the future, that sounds more like EMI. However, I suspect they're going for something that can play existing music that sounds like it was played by that artist and not new music that sounds like it was written by that artist.

I'm going to have to disagree with this statement. As much as I enjoy Mozart, he, like others before him built on those that came before.

Music from the Baroque period can be quite beautiful, and much of it was written before Mozart was born. For example, The Four Seasons (1723) by Antonio Vivalidi, Water Music (1717) by George Frideric Handel, and Brandenburg Concertos (1721) by J. S. Bach. Each of these was composed before Mozart was born in 1756.

Well, I'm not an engineer so someone else may correct me on this, but I suspect that it may have to do with the incompressibility of fluids. I would think that the pressure on the outside of the hull would be transmitted to the fluid which in turn would transmit the pressure to the inner hull causing a collapse.

This would be similar to how a free diver's lungs get compressed as they dive. The pressure is transmitted through the skin, muscle, bone, hits the lungs which are mostly gas and are compressed.

If the Oriskany (200ft max depth) ans Spiegel Grove(134 ft max depth) are any indication then more than just extreme divers will dive this. At the bottom both of these wrecks are below the recreational dive limit of 130 ft, but the top of the Spiegel Grove sits just around 60-70ft as does the top of the Oriskany. This is well within the depth limits for recreational diving and I understand that there is quite a bit to see in these wrecks above 130ft.

I might have read this wrong, but I read it as a 3 stage system, pilot chute to pull out the drogue, drogue chute, and then a cluster of 3 main chutes.

While I agree that there is something of a double standard here, I can think of several movies containing full frontal male nudity that were not rated X. For example "Any Given Sunday", "Life of Brian", "Schindler's List", and "The Crying Game" all contain full frontal male nudity. While it may not be common, it's not exactly unheard of.

Oh, so like a hurricane then, well except for the white stuff.

And you can't go 20 mph straight up unless you want to get some type of DCI either.

Seriously though if it's keeping water out it either has to be pressurized (doubtful if it's using a snorkel for air) or just watertight. If it's watertight it's probably only down to a fairly shallow depth, if it gets too deep the water pressure is going to start pushing water in through the "watertight" seals. Assuming a watertight seal (and not a pressurized vehicle) and given that the pressure at 10m (33 ft) is twice the atmospheric pressure at sea level, I'd be willing to guess that the max depth isn't much more than that (if not less).