Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Sure, a "letter" (Score 0) 121

there is absolutely no other reason to do this than being bribed outright and openly.

I can think of a reason: The good of the country and its peoples are best served by having a long copyright.

Of course, I'm not saying I agree with that reason, or that it is true in any way. However, if it were true, then a politician would be doing exactly the right thing in supporting it.

Comment Re:TED talk - David Bismark: E-voting without Frau (Score 1) 258

What's to prevent a hacker from inserting votes into the system? Granted, there is a mechanism for detecting if votes are deleted, but it relies on people checking their vote receipt against a website. The bulk of the population is not going to do that, so a hacker has fairly high probability of being able to delete votes without being detected. And what happens when a hack is detected? Is there a way of determining how many of the ballots are tainted? Do you run the election again, or go with the results of the untainted ballots?

Maybe there is more to this system than was explained in the video, but It doesn't seem entirely bombproof at first glance.

Comment Re:Spike and pesticide correllation (Score 1) 220

How can you have seasonal spikes in yearly figures?

In an annual survey released on Wednesday by the Bee Informed Partnership, a consortium of universities and research laboratories, about 5,000 beekeepers reported losing 42.1 percent of their colonies in the 12-month period that ended in April.

Comment Re:BS question (Score 1) 403

And how, exactly, does that affect the many solar powered devices around the planet? Or the microhydro sites and small scale wind turbines? Or the RGT powered lighthouses and research equipment?

There's lots of stuff designed to be off the grid, or to work specifically when the grid fails, so the loss of the grid is definitely NOT "it".

Comment Re:Probably the Oxford Electric Bell (Score 1) 403

Nope. Static electricity. One bell is positively charged, and the other negatively. The clapper is attracted to one of the bells, gets charged and is thus repelled. It is attracted to the other bell, where the charge is dissipated and the clapper picks up the opposite charge. The cycle then repeats.

Slashdot Top Deals

What good is a ticket to the good life, if you can't find the entrance?

Working...