Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Brought to you by: (Score 1) 412

Blame the people who keep electing them.

"I'm not to blame, I always vote for the guy that promises to be an honest regular Joe just like me!"

Sarcasm aside, I do sort of agree with you. I don't blame the voters for voting the guy in, they are ALL corrupt, and even if they weren't, it's not like there's any way we'd know until it's too late. They don't have any real need to commit to their promises and it's not like they're up front and tell us they're going to screw us over. Seriously, blaming people for not knowing the future is utter horse shit. You should be ashamed of yourself for believing what you're saying without giving it one ounce of thought.

What I do blame the voters for is we never, for lack of a better term, fire any of these people. Just imagine what a few recall elections would do.

Social Networks

Is Twitter Aiding and Abetting Terrorism? 315

wiredmikey writes with word (and the following extract from a CNN report) that "Nitsana Darshan-Leitner, director of the Shurat HaDin Israel Law Center, sent a letter to Twitter on Thursday asserting that the company is violating U.S. law by allowing groups such as Hezbollah and al Qaeda affiliate al-Shabaab to use its popular online network. ... In her letter, Darshan-Leitner noted that Hezbollah and al-Shabaab are officially designated as terrorist organizations under U.S. law. She also cited a 2010 Supreme Court case — Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project — which upheld a key provision of the Patriot Act prohibiting material support to groups designated as terrorist outfits."

Comment Re:No *official* port. (Score 1) 333

There was a Dilbert cartoon where Wally printed off a document for the PHB and handed it to him. The boss said "Great, but I asked you to print these in color!" "Oh, well Black and White technically are colors so... oh... I see!"

In the last frame Dilbert asked Wally "and that satisfied his need to make unnecessary changes?" And Wally goes "Yep! The best part is while I was talking to the boss, the color copies were printing!"

Censorship

Go Daddy Reverses Course On SOPA 330

An anonymous reader writes "Go Daddy has relented in the face of public pressure and will no longer support SOPA. 'Fighting online piracy is of the utmost importance, which is why Go Daddy has been working to help craft revisions to this legislation—but we can clearly do better,' Warren Adelman, Go Daddy's newly appointed CEO, said." Go Daddy was put under a tremendous amount of pressure from around the internet; a boycott had been organized for Dec. 29th, and several major sites threatened to pull their domains from Go Daddy, including Stack Overflow and I Can Has Cheezburger. The U.S. House Judiciary committee posted a list of companies who support SOPA (PDF).

Comment Re:Shocked. (Score 1) 851

One thing you should consider, though, is her supervisor will likely see how she's a team player . She may (and yes, reality doesn't always work this way I'll concede) end up getting a raise or avoiding a layoff.

Having your coworkers like you is a good thing.

Comment Re:No (Score 3, Interesting) 405

You'll save a lot more battery if you undervoltage your CPU. Eg. My Galaxy Nexus by default runs at 1350mV. I can run it perfectly fine on 1200mV, even overclocked to 1,4GHz. By my (possibly completely wrong) logic, the faster the CPU runs, the shorter time it spends in higher voltage states. Thus, overclocking and keeping the same voltage (or even undervoltage) actually saves energy.

(Of course, underclocking also achieves the same since the voltage is lowered automatically. But then I've got a slower device rather than a faster device, while using more or less the same amount of juice.)

Comment Re:Speaking as a road user not in a 4,000lb box... (Score 1) 318

But when I point out that the same happens with pedestrians and crosswalks, you claim that's not the same. I honestly don't see a massive difference between sidewalks and crosswalks to the idea of bike lanes.

You don't see how stopping traffic to let people through isn't a huge difference?

Why are you, as a car driver, so opposed to bikes on the road?

Because I don't want to hit one.

They don't reduce your safety.

Yes, they do.

...implying that there exists causeless actions gives in to helplessness that promotes unsafe behaviors...

Nobody said 'causeless'. I can't believe the ignorance you're displaying here! Are you over-zealously defending your point or are you really so inexperienced at life that you don't understand this topic? I really hope it's the former.

...if accidents are unavoidable, why try?

Because the number of accidents is an integer and not a boolean.

And yes, that defeatist attitude is real, and does reduce safety, that's why the NHTSA removed the word "accident" from the Fatal Accident Reporting System. http://www.nhtsa.gov/people/injury/airbags/Archive-04/PresBelt/crash_accident.html (not a press release on FARS renaming, but an official article declaring "Crashes Aren't Accidents."

Oh that's classic, man. Hahaha. Do you see the world 'preventable' all over the article you sent me? Think about it.

Slashdot Top Deals

"I've seen it. It's rubbish." -- Marvin the Paranoid Android

Working...