Yes actually! In that case the insurance plan covered some twenty type of contraceptives. Their objection was to paying for a couple of specific types. Those types are still available at the persons own cost. Neither are expensive enough that paying for them yourself should be an undue burden.

Uhhhh...The law. There are thousands of pages of tax code that define what expenses can be charged as valid business expenses. Expenseing some of the cost of your home, car, and even some food is possible. However, you have to meet pretty strict guidelines and have to keep extensive records. Even then, the IRS can decide you can't.

Why would anyone need to be an advocate for "cheap, easy and widely available contraception" when that is already the case? Are you claiming that that is not the current state of things? For all but the most destitute, access to contraception is a non-issue.

Why would you think that changing sexual behavior or cultural impact would be leading reasons why someone would oppose abortion? I don't even think most are religiously motivated. For many the issue is that they see it as ending the life of an actual or potential human being.

He never said "daily". He likely drove it once per week.

Your missing a few stats for a valid comparison. I believe that the miles driver per vehicle and miles driven per person are much higher in the U.S. This is a bit dated but here is fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles:

Japan 2.7
France 3.5
Germany 3.5
Sweden 2.3
UK 1.8
U.S. 1.9

And to put bad driving in perspective... Mexico 17.6!!!

https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/...

It varies greatly by state and locality. In most places it is unlikely you would be pulled over for less than 80 on a 70MPH highway. If you are, then there is a good chance you would just get a warning. However, there are some places where there is little tolerance or that use speeding tickets to generate revenue.

In many places, unless your doing something else unsafe you might cruise at 85 with no worries. I recently received a warning for 90MPH in a 70MPH zone and that was the first time I've been pulled over in years.

Somewhat true but your pretty much limited to small airfields. The nearest airports with normal commercial service would still require some driving and wouldn't really save you much time. Unless you have your own plane or helicopter your better off driving.

Your perception is skewed. The commute he mentions is indeed that long. It's a vast empty area and there is no option other than driving.

It's an outstanding web sso product. A few clicks and your set

I was there in the early 80's. Computer security officer was one of my additional duties at that time. Tempest was a pain in the ass but it was not a secret. There were signs that had to be posted, training that everyone had to have, inspections that had to be done. Power cables had to be separated from data cables and other cables had to only cross at right angles. Lots and lots of paranoia.

I thought I'd miss my 17" too. However, I've found that setting the resolution on the 15" Retina Macbook Pro to same resolution as the old 17" looks even better than the 17 did. It's also a hell of a lot lighter. Try it...you'll like it.

That still exists and works over Thunderbolt now.

It defaults to twice the DPI but can be set to other resolutions. https://www.apple.com/macbook-...

"Native resolution: 2880 by 1800 pixels (Retina); scaled resolutions: 1920 by 1200, 1680 by 1050, 1280 by 800, and 1024 by 640 pixels"

All iMacs can act as an external display for another machine. I'm using two of them for that at the moment. A quick keyboard shortcut switches it from displaying it's own video to displaying the external video. It's called Target Display Mode if you want to google it.