1. No incentive.
I don't think this is true. The prestige and publicity gained from being the group to beat the challenge should be sufficient incentive.
2. No disassembly.
3. No longer running.
4. Full disclosure.
No argument here!
With regard to the Digital Economy Act 2010:
The Lib Dems promissed to repeal it if elected.
The Tories said that if they were elected, they would drop any "flawed" legislation. Shortly after, Cameron said that "rejecting the Bill then or reconsidering the entire piece of legislation now would be an unacceptable set-back for the important measures it contains."
After the election, the LibDem-Conservative coalition released the Great Repeal Bill to undo some of the over-legislating of the Labour party. Sadly, the Digital Economy Act wasn't on the list.
I proposed something to Google that would certainly help with this issue. But they seemed more interested in bending over for the app. developers.
All configuration systems will take some time. All you are saying is that the autotools could be more optimal, which is hardly a "new problem that autotools creates".
And as for checking for strcpy() and then failing at link-time from a missing dynamic library symbol, the developer can check for dynamic library versions during the configuration. Short of having the configuration system parse the whole source code (in any language!), I don't see how else it can know what symbols it would need to check for anyway - this can only really be resolved at link-time.
To make this perfectly clear – the game is being reimplemented from scratch; all they share is a name
Isn't this one of the main bones of contention though? The www.nexuiz.com URL no longer takes you to the GPL project it used to, it displays a page about Illfonic's new console game and there's a tiny link in the corner of the page that takes you to the original project page!
Couldn't they have used a different name for what is, essentially, a different game?
If you want to put yourself on the map, publish your own map.