Most microwaves have a power control. 90 seconds at power 2 or 3, wait 1 minute. Flip, 1 minute at full power. Wait 3 minutes. Serve.

There exist websites and books devoted to this appliance and how to use it correctly. This is a non-story.

Caveat: there are some nice physics going on in the explanation but only for the layman. Look elsewhere for the gritty detail we /.ers are used to seeing.

Undergrad here. So the base case is taken care of and you call your translation function recursively. What's the difficulty here?

IIRC yahoo is worth less than nothing at the moment. Re: www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-03-17/is-yahoo-s-business-worth-less-than-nothing

Why would I listen to a company with such outstanding performance?

Sounds like your mobile device is a mobile-device.

To counter your anecdote my University *does* sell textbooks. I've bought lab manuals the-day-of when I forgot them before my commute.

Correct, they are not the same thing.

Tagging can contain the structure of a folder system with inherant deduplication of data. 1 tag per foldername contained in path. Done. Then you can add the file to another "folder" by adding a tag. Search for your regular foldername and you have your "folder" without browsing an entire hierarchy of foldernames.

That being said I don't really tag my files - I use folder hierarchies and don't worry about dupes (this is /. after all). I can see the expanded utility of tags though especially from a "searchable data" perspective.

XP is decent for its time and is still sufficient for some purposes(firewalled etc.)

I think parent wanted (Wordpress==WinME).

This.

Also: I can go purchase an rc plane/heli complete with cam transmitter and perform the same activity right now in a comparable location. There are TOYS that can accomplish this. Have the FAA complained yet about flying toys with video? Serious question.

Where do I mod this article -1 Flamebait? I'd really like to know.

There is a simple proof to the contrary but the /. comment system is too small a space in which to contain it. There are many, many hours of Susskind videos on Youtube, primarily and most recently "ER=EPR|Leonard Susskind", which deal with exactly this.

If you were to create a world AND place yourself* in it, then yes you would be subject to its laws.

*yourself in this context could be a digital brainscan or equivalent representation as long as the representation has what you posess-free will(maybe) consciousness etc ...

First off IANAP.
To throw some variables out there:

As I understand it the conjecture under review is:
M(rest)=M(grav)=M(inertia)

Implicit from Einsteins field equations,
R_mu_nu - (1/2)g_mu_nu*R + g_mu_nu*GAMMA = (8pi*G/c^4)*T_mu_nu

somewhat like the next layer beyond E^2=m^4c^4+p^2c^2 (lorentz invarient form iirc?)

I wont see it in my University courses for a few years but from online lectures and pdfs i have a bare understanding of the implications if the conjecture is false:
1. The dark matter problem 'could' go away if the conjecture is found to be false. Not too likely imo

2 If the different masses are NOT equivalent then here there be dragons! i.e. new interesting physics underneath-perheps leading to new propulsion systems.

I'm sure someone will pipe up and correct me if i'm wrong enough.

Sounds like you should have rolled the updates into an updated xp iso. Search the MS kb for more info.