Comment Re:Correct, but silly (Score 1) 172
So neither person has a claim.
And this Price guy's reputation is in the toilet. Things have a way of working out.
So neither person has a claim.
And this Price guy's reputation is in the toilet. Things have a way of working out.
That's not the way fair use works. If I write a review that includes quotes from your novel, I have created a new work that makes fair use of your material. You are NOT now a joint owner of my review. If you choose to reproduce my review, even if it contains your content, you are infringing. (Unless of course you can make a fair use argument yourself).
That's not even close to what happened in this case.
TFS mentioned that adding the comment was unlikely to be the basis of transformation. It is transformative because of the radical context change which creates a commentary on the medium in the same way Marcel Duchamp transformed a porcelain urinal into art by placing it in a gallery and titling it "Fountain."
Andy Warhol using an image of a Campbell's Soup can in his art did not mean Campbell's had to change their can or stop selling soup.
I don't believe there's any case against Mahoney using the image she made. I'd like to see it go to court.
How is this insightful? The Patriot Act is less than 36 hours away from expiring, and all signs point toward the extension being filibustered into defeat.
It's insightful because only some provisions of the Patriot Act will expire, and the FISA court will continue to do whatever they want.
Laws as sweeping as the Patriot Act don't just go away.
As for the other activities, well, this is how spying gets done. That is how you spy on people in this day and age. With all of the justified criticism of the NSA, it would still be bad if they couldn't spy at all. They do, in fact, have a function to fulfill, and it is a function that needs fulfilling.
Why don't you unpack that statement a little bit? What is the domestic function of the NSA?
If you said anything besides, "It doesn't have a domestic function" then you are wrong. The US government is not supposed to be spying on US citizens. If there's some foreign government or organization that's communicating with an American citizen or permanent resident in order to commit a crime, just get a goddamned warrant.
I think a Dixieland Jazz parade would be suitable.
I'm prepared to play in the second line at the Patriot Act jazz funeral.
they don't even have bars in panama city. its cuz of the laws.
https://www.google.com/webhp?s...
Ever been to a Panama City Bar?
Oh yeah. When I was in college, I had a cousin who was stationed at Tyndall AFB and visited him. Must have been February 1981 or '82.
An "Underwater Sonic Screwdriver" sounds like a drink you'd order at a Panama City bar.
Sure, it's HBO, and sure they have some stellar in-house programming; but it's one channel.
Not exactly - because it's not just "HBO Now", but also "HBO Then".
That is to say, you aren't just getting current seasons of stuff like Game of Thrones - you are getting all the seasons they aired. Plus things that aren't even airing that were great - like Rome. Plus many more somewhat-current movies than Netflix has (although to be fair Netflix has a small number of near-current movies I actually like to watch, whereas almost none of the movies HBO listed were interesting at all to me).
That said I may just subscribe during Game of Thrones, then cancel again... it'll be interesting to see how I feel at that point.
I have an application for this where I'm using 365 to 395 nm older style to attract bugs efficiently.
Come on, give us a few details. Are you collecting the bugs for research or are you using the lights as bait for your backyard zapper? Or are you collecting bugs to feed to your pet iguanas?
That's too tantalizing a statement for you not to tell us a little more.
All he did was facilitate transactions among consenting adults.
Illegal transactions. And he got a cut from every deal made.
So arrest and prosecute the federal agent for attempted murder. He's the one who should be in jail. Not Ulbricht.
You don't think facilitating the transaction for a hitman for a percentage of the price should be a crime?
Remember, Ulbricht got a cut of the money for every single drug transaction on Silk Road. It's as if he bought a downtown building and rented it out to drug dealers (and hit men) and got a cut for every single transaction.
I know there's a belief that the Internet is a magical place where laws should not apply, because it's digital!, but that's just not how it works.
Weirdly there's no evidence of that claim, and the government decided not to try and prosecute for that.
Two different things. The government also decided not to charge Al Capone for murder.
The article itself mentions that five of the attempts to hire a hitman were actually scams targeted at Ulbricht
And he fell for all of them.
"Attempting to hire a hitman" is not exactly like falling for someone selling a fake Rolex in Times Square.
It's a naive, domestic operating system without any breeding, but I think you'll be amused by its presumption.
