If we compare this to even the crappiest online definition of violence: âoebehaviour involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or somethingâ. Bingo. It fits: Pregnancy = may hurt, damage or kill. Intercourse = a man using his physical force to penetrate a woman. Intention / purpose of the act of intercourse = to cause pregnancy. PIV is therefore intentional harm / violence. Intentional sexual harm of a man against a woman through penile penetration = RAPE.

Through an all-pervasive and powerful male propaganda, they stuff our minds from infancy with the idea that PIV is normal, desirable and erotic, before we can even conceive of it as something horrifying, and make sure we never see any alternative to their lie â" or that if we do, we can no longer take in the information, are punished for thinking and saying otherwise. The fact we may not immediately feel raped doesnâ(TM)t mean itâ(TM)s not rape, objectively speaking.

Blaming the victim. What are we, as a society, doing to help these men learn how to find women? All I see is abuse heaped on them by people who get squicked out to discover that these men have sexual desires, too. It's like a national sport, everyone does it and to express any sympathy with these unwillingly celibate males is social poison.

It's just hypocritical because non-profit entities set themselves above businesses who pursue that filthy profit - and yet the non-profits do the same thing. Using evil means to achieve good goals - what is that?

No such thing as a non-crazy feminist. The entire movement is hate-based, and founded upon a flawed assumption that men and women are the same.

When's the last time you opened a product labeled "Made in one of those four countries"? Yeah, that's what I thought. Seriously, there needs to be a meme or something that eliminates whatever argument someone made, if the only counter-argument is "it works in 100% white countries where everyone agrees on everything and the population is less than most US states". In 20 years demographic trends will be very, very different in these countries and we may be able to have a sane conversation about these issues, after diversity has been achieved.

Protectionism AND socialism? WTF? Which one are you, a racist or a progressive? If you're progressive, you support socialism. If you're a racist, you support protectionism. You seem to be confused. Progressives are internationalists. If there is a decision that Obama could make that benefits 10,000 Americans or 10,003 Somalians, then the second choice is clearly correct. If you're a racist, then you think "America first" and fuck the rest of the world.

So, which are you? Nationalist, or socialist? There's no union between these two sets. They are polar opposites.

Worse, the H1Bs require their employer to sponsor them to remain in the United States, which they will only do if the individual is working for them.

As a result, the employer not only holds and H1B's livelihood under a Damocles Sword, but even their residence in this country. You want to quit? Well, I hope you're prepared to move yourself back to where you came from on your own dime, which is also what happens if we fire you.

So, the employer has even more power over H1B workers, to the point where the worker is unlikely to report anything but the worst abuse...

A man who buys a drill doesn't need a drill. He needs holes.

The problem is when you define those that don't agree with you as bigots, and have no problem engaging in bigotry yourself. You call it social justice and really can't see why anyone would disagree with your extreme left-wing views. It's an affliction that, in my estimation, will only get worse. Why should any leftist listen to people who are obviously dissidents?

"What our enemies oppose, we will support. And whatever our enemies support, we will oppose."
-- Mao Tse-Tung

Do you even know what the No True Scotsman fallacy is? Seriously? "A true socialist would never have done that" gimme a fucking break. Deal with your historical legacy, because until you do, nobody will take you seriously. Socialists did horrible, horrible things in the name of socialism. Deal.

That's because their consultants told them to shut up because it was harming their brand image. Greenpeace hasn't changed, it's still full of the same wackos and want-to-end-civilization scary people.

It even syncs the disks before shutting down! v_v

Such a non-news story... omg, this this is "interesting" in so far as an odd tool that has little possible use(?)

That's my thinking...

If nobody gives a shit what they think, why'd you spend a bunch of words attempting to deflate what they said? Did that sting? Methinks he doth protest too much.

Hard evidence? Counselor, I move to bring Tolkien's letters into the courtroom. The hearing is adjourned for several days of reading. Get busy! Oh, you don't want to because you have better things to do than Tolkien-lore? Gosh, what's that called legally?