Comment Re:The term "Sexual Harassment" is very misleading (Score 1) 182
Without any independant verification it's about as credible as both the woman's and Github's stories.
Without any independant verification it's about as credible as both the woman's and Github's stories.
There is no proper model, that's why it isn't simple.
So what happens to the rabbits then?
They just want less animals to be born.
http://opensource.org/osd, criteria 6
Ofcourse, there's no legally official definition of the words "open source", but that's pretty much the definition the whole world uses.
You could create a source code license to do that, but it wouldn't be an open source license.
[...] who was thinking of shifting to an economics major [...]. I told that student they are much better off being a B student in computer science than an A+ student in English
Except being a B student in economics is probably better than being an A+ student in English as well.
But is being a B student in economics better than being a B student in English?
Also, wanting to not be rigorous is apparently better than wanting to be rigorous, seeing as this student has gotten an internship.
Paper mache vulcanos are the only science high school students will ever need to know. That and intelligent design.
Also; nukular.
Mod parent "+1 attention whoring crybaby".
That's the exact thought I had when I saw the video.
The "human-like" hand is dead in the middle of the uncanny valley.
In fact, the 3D printed hand had motion which looked far more "natural", despite looking nothing like a natural object.
IMHO, trying to make a prostethic look human is like saying "I'm ashamed of not having a hand".
Adults will stare uncomfortably at both. With the printed hand I think most people will just think "well, he doesn't have a problem with it, why should I?".
And children will be exclaiming "cool" because... well... it is cool. Guy doesn't have a hand but he's got a machine as a hand. What's not cool about that? You'd rather children be exclaiming "creepy"?
Scientology's beliefs are idiotic, but not much more idiotic than believing in some guy walking up a hill and coming back down with slates with "commandments" apparently handed to him by some deity.
The problem with scientology is the frequent intimidation, their extremely litigious habits, the abusive behaviour towards members, the rampant commercialism, the indocrtination techniques and a bunch of other things that are decidedly evil and beyond the comprehension of any decent human being.
Scientology isn't a church, nor is it a cult. Scientology is a corporation. And whereas most corporations are just greedy and soulless, scientology doesn't stop at mere ruthless money grabbing; scientology seems to want to actively hurt it's victims as well.
Mod parent "+1 informative and no further discussion required".
This.
Every single site that was vulnerable to heardbleed should be resetting all passwords.
There are a LOT sites that were vulnerable, but very few have done large scale password resets.
The only bad thing Healthcare.gov is doing, is letting people choose to change passwords; they should do like Yahoo did.
So the solution to competing interrests and mutually exclussive valid concerns is to always pick only one concern/interrest and always ingore the others?
Good luck with that.
Children arriving at nursery school don't need a $40 set to be building for an hour.
The moon is made of green cheese. -- John Heywood