Comment Re:Sling me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast (Score 1) 112
which gives a very nice view of the upcoming windows 10 OS doesn't it?
which gives a very nice view of the upcoming windows 10 OS doesn't it?
i'm doing it right now. i wanted to keep my old network config and open a new network for guests at my house.
no it's the technically legal way of having to opt out of something that most people don't even realize they are doing in the first place.
we definitely don't need better marketing.
that doesn't sound very agile, is the name ironic?
the flying spaghetti monster told me you are a fucking twat.
FWIW
"And if you're a publicly traded company, if your stockholders decide you're paying your people too much, you can get sued out of existence."
do you have any prior examples that would validate this statement?
if brother is paying for shipping they must get something out of it, most likely by putting new toner in the cartridges and then selling them to third party suppliers where the end price is more than their costs.
a hosting platform for your company's secret patent and financial data, you store it on my servers, i sell it off to your competitors, the company is closed and i go retire... since it's a american corporation i won't be held liable for my subterfuge, worse case i blame it on "hackers".
where do you buy these flags and flag symbols now?
what universe do you live in where apple products cost more than PCs for comparable speed and power?
"That would be like getting a $1,000 fine if you made $100,000 a year. You'd notice."
you'd notice, then write it off and not care... just like AT&T will do.
Life is fair. to paraphrase that one movie "everything in nature tries to find a natural equilibrium with the surrounding environment", like how water tries to find it's level. the thing that makes life seem unfair are the actions of people who try to pervert this natural equality but fucking over their fellow man.
so Life is fair, people are not.
to quote that other movie
"i always thought life was what we make of it."
and in that line of reasoning i have always felt that we should strive to be fair and make the world a better, fairer place than give up and tote the line that somehow existence is naturally unfair (which is usually what is given as an explanation by those who are fucking you over to justify their actions).
"what evidence do you have that the politicians have been bought off?"
Because they are politicians.... that's like asking proof that water is wet.
"may actually have been worse in days gone by."
and they may not.
seriously, what's the point of making a statement that uses the word "may" when trying to frame a discussion. (although after trying to read your post a few times, i think the problem is either your frantic haste in writing the message or a lack of basic understand when it comes to sentence structure/english)
Beware of all enterprises that require new clothes, and not rather a new wearer of clothes. -- Henry David Thoreau