Comment Re:Ecology vs archeology (Score 1) 465
You know in a few seconds you could have found several sources -- some decades old, so untainted by this issue or modern "right-wing exaggeration" -- that would have told you that the area is a near-lifeless desert with effectively no precipitation and practically no wind erosion.
even thinking about it for a second before posting would have made the poster realize that this sentence is just absurd:
"somehow I think it highly unlikely that people and animals avoided walking at that location for thousands of years as well as off course full exposure to weathering, wind and rain, which will obviously return the surface to uniform finish in short order."
but yet the images at the site nonetheless has existed for thousands of years.