Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Why is the government scared to talk about thes (Score 1) 246

Why is the federal government (and its agencies) so scared to allow state and local law enforcement agencies to reveal the use of these devices?

Well, you could find out by assembling your own "stingray" piecemeal using some of the test equipment in the links below, and use it to monitor/record police/DHS/NSA and wait to see what charges they decide to prosecute you for if you're arrested, and then take the government to court for the same charges.

http://www.testequipmentdepot....

http://www.testequipmentdepot....

Although your chances of getting the same 'justice' system that is complicit in these criminal acts by those in government to turn around and prosecute these same criminals are slim at best.

Strat

Comment Re:How do Climate Change Believers Profit? (Score 1) 448

Hmm, what industries could profit from climate change true believers?

How about governments, those who run them, and those tied to and who profit from government? They gain ever more power & control over ever-wider-ranging areas of life and have another excuse to squeeze the marks for more of their wealth.

Strat

The Almighty Buck

How One Climate-Change Skeptic Has Profited From Corporate Interests 448

Lasrick writes Elected officials who want to block the EPA and legislation on climate change frequently refer to a handful of scientists who dispute anthropogenic climate change. One of scientists they quote most often is Wei-Hock Soon, a scientist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics who claims that variations in the sun's energy can largely explain recent global warming. Newly released documents show the extent to which Dr. Soon has made a fortune from corporate interests. 'He has accepted more than $1.2 million in money from the fossil-fuel industry over the last decade while failing to disclose that conflict of interest in most of his scientific papers. At least 11 papers he has published since 2008 omitted such a disclosure, and in at least eight of those cases, he appears to have violated ethical guidelines of the journals that published his work.' The Koch Brothers are cited as a source of Dr. Soon's funding.

Comment Re:The Constitution is Clear - Tenth Amendment (Score 1) 78

Alternate idea: an amendment that makes it a felony for government officials/reps/etc. to violate or aid/abet the violation of the constitutional rights of one or more people.

Warrantless mass surveillance already violates the 4th Amendment and multiple laws.

What effect will another law have when the existing laws are ignored? Existing laws against these ongoing abuses have already, and continue to be, flaunted by those in government.

The digital Panopticon, if it is going to exist, needs to be universal in that citizens may not be denied the right and ability to use it to keep tabs on those in government.

Strat

Comment Re:The Constitution is Clear - Tenth Amendment (Score 2) 78

How quaint. The Feds haven't taken the Constitution seriously for generations.

Maybe it's time for a "Digital Second Amendment".

Whatever technological means the government may use to monitor/surveil/track/datamine individuals without a warrant may also be used to monitor/surveill/track/datamine those in government both while on and off the government clock by otherwise law-abiding people.

Strat

Comment Re:Time to go back to land lines and cash. (Score 4, Insightful) 192

At what point do we start putting these criminals away? They have broken every law on the books.

One of the most insidious effects of this sort of Panopticon-level data collection & analysis is that it works as well against prosecutors, judges, AGs, and even SCOTUS justices, as it does some CEO or key IT admin somewhere they're interested in compromising.

Parallel construction is blind, therefor the current US justice system no longer is. Along with every other government agency, bureau, department, etc, all the way down.

Total Information = Total Control

The US Government is under the control of those who control that information. Even if the target is squeaky-clean, they are perfectly capable of planting things like kiddie-porn or any other convenient data on a hard drive such that it would stand up to the type/depth of forensics used in the typical criminal trial.

Threatening to leak damaging private information, especially when it involves an elected official right before a(n) (re)election, works without even involving the justice system or making a public scene.

Strat

Comment Re: Papers, Comrade (Score 1) 116

As you can see, the majority of the population supports this. Who are you to tell the people what's best for them?

Well let's see, he appears to be somebody who advocates for political and ideological changes by informing his fellows about what the government is up to and what the consequences may well be, thereby instilling fear in the public over government intrusions into their privacy and more.

A textbook terrorist using mass fear to accomplish his goals is what he appears to be (at least that's how the government press release will describe him after he's been detained for 'enhanced interrogation'.).

Strat

Comment Re:It's not less precipitation. (Score 1) 264

That's a strawman, economic studies show it costs 1% or so of GWP to respond to AGW

Other economic studies disagree.

If you want to discuss those you need to bring science to the table to back up your positions like the scientists do.

Hockey stick charts built on 'massaged' data and failed computer models unable to even accurately model past, known patterns is not 'science'.

That's Alchemy, aka snake-oil.

Strat

Comment Re:Pointless (Score 2) 111

~Government checklist for initiating drone strikes on domestic threats.~

If the target adheres to, implements, and/or publicly promotes any individual item or subset from the following, the target may added to the strike list.

1: Unplug. Yes, unless you need that phone on, it goes off, or into airplane mode. The HTC One M8 has an extreme battery saver mode, when combined with airplane mode, makes a useful alarm clock.

2: Learn the basics of OpenPGP [1], and build a web of trust. One can even have keysigning parties, and done right, no computers need to be brought over... public key fingerprints and IDs can be printed on pieces of paper, and people can indicate that the printed item is theirs.

3: Use social networks minimally, if at all.

4: Use OpenPGP tools on top of messaging and other protocols.

5: Use a VPN service, or perhaps TOR behind the VPN service, since it is routine for admins to block TOR exit nodes, or any nodes relating to TOR.

6: Use containers [2] for web browsing, so the social media buttons on one site can't chat with the social media buttons on another.

7: Check your Web browser against Panopticlick, and fix it so it isn't unique.

8: Even if one doesn't use TOR, use a VPN. This at least keeps the ground level ISP from modifying your traffic... they have to either block it, throttle it, or let it through... and (for most purposes) can't modify it.

9: Assume that any data that leaves the machine is available for anyone. Encrypt your stuff, or face the consequences.

Privacy can't be bought. It is a Class A Felony under secret Federal intelligence service court directives.

[1]: OpenPGP can be PGP, NetPGP, GnuPG, or any of those tools that use the OpenPGP format.

[2]: Containers can be VMs, sandboxes, or even separate user accounts.

FTFY

Strat

Comment Re:What about knife factory workers? (Score 1) 188

You've never read Atlas Shrugged.

If you think Rand was advocating anything 'collectivist' at all, perfect or otherwise, then you could not have read the same 'Atlas Shrugged' that the rest of the planet has. Rand railed against the sort of collectivist/socialist policies & programs etc she saw gradually taking root in the West that she and her family suffered through while in the USSR.

I'm convinced you got fed your opinions on AS and Rand from your teachers/professors and/or your political/ideological peers.

Try actually reading a work before you try to take it apart, or else you risk looking the fool.

Strat

Comment Re:What about knife factory workers? (Score 1) 188

One thing I'm curious about - how in a Rand society can "informed and reasoned voting choices help" when the government is so powerless in such a setting?

Government power can be "weak" without being powerless. There are degrees and scopes of power.

Ah yes, the society full of perfect citizens so that there is no need for citizens to work together.

Nice straw man. I never said anything about "perfect" anything, nor is perfection required. I'm not talking about some fantasy society in your head. I'm talking about the US and the ideas and concepts the authors of the DoI/Constitution brought to life.

If you truly want to understand what I'm talking about, I suggest you read the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers as a good starting point to understanding these concepts.

Ah - personal attack time I see. Maybe you are proving that point about the limitations of your education if you are resorting to that, maybe not, but you are comically far off the mark if you are pretending that I am a product of that system as I am assuming you are.

If your take-away from Atlas Shrugged is truly as you've indicated through your comments here, then either your education or your critical thinking abilities are in serious doubt.

Of course, it could easily be the case that you understand fully the concepts presented in AS and you simply don't believe men can rule themselves and build a free and open society and must have a King or ruling elites in charge and making all decisions, and so are being intentionally obtuse in railing against these concepts and ideas.

Whatever the case, this article & discussion are about to go to the archives, so I'm done here. I'm sure there will be many opportunities in future article discussions to further this discussion.

Strat

Comment Re:What about knife factory workers? (Score 1) 188

With respect, that's how capitalism started instead of the way it's going. It's why you have other things to temper it, first the Church and now government. The way Rand suggests that there should be a small and ineffective government without a rampant crony-capitalist oligarchy happening via some magic is part of her damage.

Nothing magical at all. It, however, does require citizens who are willing to do their homework and make informed and reasoned voting choices.

Thanks to the decades of destruction I've watched being waged upon the US education system by the government and their teacher union accomplices, educated and informed citizens are most definitely the exception rather than the rule these days. Your take-away from 'Atlas Shrugged' proves the point.

To have a government powerful enough to provide all the social 'safety nets' and giveaways means having a government that is a ripe target for corruption both from within and without.

Nobody bribes a politician or political body that does not have the power to accomplish their goals. Same principle applies to computer networks. Better a network of stand-alone machines each with their own security systems, than a server/dumb terminal system where an attacker needs only compromise 1 machine to control the entire network.

Freedom is a zero-sum game in that the only way government gains power is by taking power away from States and citizens respectively.

Strat

Slashdot Top Deals

Today is a good day for information-gathering. Read someone else's mail file.

Working...