Comment Re:It is just so horrible (Score 1) 306
I'm not sure what you mean. I was just working with what those upthread had written (an analogy where IT worker productivity was being compared to algorithmic complexity).
I'm not sure what you mean. I was just working with what those upthread had written (an analogy where IT worker productivity was being compared to algorithmic complexity).
In the article (by the economist, which is usually pretty decent) it compares how currently the higher you go in the income scale, the more you work.
To a point, that is. The article talks a lot about college-educated knowledge workers (i.e., the upper-middle class), but it conspicuously fails to mention how many hours C-level executives etc. (i.e., the actual "rich") work.
This strikes me as a case of "this new generation sucks a lot" which we roll through every 20 years or so. The WW2 generation said the same thing about the Boomers...
In that particular case, they were right!
Linear time should be expected (if it takes longer per ticket when there are more, thats bad, but non-polynomial, thats just horrid)
Log(time) is neither polynomial nor horrid (and also achievable by a really good IT person, since frequent similar problems should start getting solved more efficiently or permanently).
If you don't like Comcast, switch to satellite or cut the cord and use the internet.
I did "cut the cord," so now I complain about Comcast's rates on Internet service. There is no alternative (I live in an older neighborhood with shitty copper, just far enough from the Wi-Max towers to fail to get a signal).
But you as an investor will never get rich that way. People want to buy into something like Google, Apple, Amazon, whatever (remember the Netscape IPO?) - that starts out at $30 a share and zooms to $300 a share. The only way that happens is if your company grows! So while never growing is fine, it only appeals to a limited set of investors. Most investors want to buy a stock that will go up in value over time.
And of course, the real issue here is that it's completely and utterly inappropriate for a regulated utility to be that kind of "growth company!"
I would fall asleep behind the wheel during my 5 minute commute
If your commute is 5 minutes by car, then you need to fucking walk (or maybe ride a bike) instead!
this kind of shit has been encroaching on us
FTFY.
Yeah and if you were one of the 20 million laid off and had kids to feed what are you going to do?
Live of your emergency fund and immediately temporarily reduce your standard of living, so that you don't have to permanently reduce it later.
Those responsible for sacking the people who have just been sacked have been sacked.
What jurisdiction do you live in that actually licenses software engineers?
(Hint: Step 2 is "defect to SK.")
Unlike the situation with Ukraine, the West might see that as an improvement. China, on the other hand, might disagree...
What really should have happened is that all his Monsanto-using neighbors should have gotten in trouble for allowing their seeds to escape. Since they were the ones who were parties to the agreement with Monsanto, they were the ones who broke that agreement.
Of course, Monsanto suing its own customers would be bad for business, so it went after the innocent third-party instead...
Wow, what's your occupation? Even being a software developer, my budget and retirement asset numbers are almost exactly an order of magnitude lower than yours...
The hardest part of climbing the ladder of success is getting through the crowd at the bottom.