I guess you're trying to troll here, but I daresay you haven't heard me trying to make any dodgy connections between causes and events. But please do stereotype on. I makes you look so boss-like.

The ultimate housecleaning, if you believe it's coming, is to be a simple matter of justice carried out by a righteous God.

Power to the sphincter!

Possibly the evidence of a lack of evidence.

Thank you very much for such a complete response.

Power to the blamers! There is far too much power to be garnered from inflaming (occasionally real, but often wholly manufactured) biases.
But things like the Rolling Stone UVA rape hoax, global warming, GamerGate, &c have blown the lid off what a bunch of cheap hucksters the Grievance Industrial Complex are.
Go back to hell and stay there, creeps.

"'Doesn't carry all the bad PR', fustakrakich? Apparently you weren't paying much attention during the last election," said Mitt Romney.

"Sustainable" is the biggest unintentionally funny concept going. The atomic mokita is that the world economy, itself, is unsustainable. Whatever Ehrlichian silliness you care to trot out is currently in the process of correcting itself using the traditional means: war.

â(TM)Tâ(TM)râ(TM)uâ(TM)e.

The Superconducting Super Collider would, if not cancelled, have had 40TeV collisions about 15-20 years ago. The LHC is using computing resources that are very challenging to supply in 2015, exceeding what would have been achievable for SSC by a factor of perhaps 1000 (15-20 years of Moore's Law.)

Had SSC been completed, would the computing and detector technology have been able to make effective use of the collisions? Was it in fact a correct decision to abandon it at that time? Would the much higher collision energy have reduced the detection/computational load in some way? (E.g. higher signal to noise, leading to needing many fewer collisions.)

â(TM)Hâ(TM)eâ(TM)lâ(TM)pâ(TM)!

I thought anthropogenic global warming was solving that?

In a theological sense, modulo the crawling, sure. This is the Meaning of Life we're talking about.

there are infinite answers to this:

anywhere north of the south pole such that, after walking south one mile, the "circumference" of that latitude is one mile, or some integer fraction (e.g., 1 mile west results in 4 "laps"), then one mile "north" will return to same starting point.

Now THAT, sir, is a theory.