Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Meanwhile ... (Score 1) 266

It's clear that it is necessary to show that the NSA violations are widespread and pervasive. And it's clear that what has been exposed so far is NOT enough, as discussion has occurred in the media and various forums but there's no evidence that things do not remain business as usual at the NSA. I only hope there are still some juicy bits in the trove yet to reveal. It looks like it's going to take a drip water torture of secret releases in order to keep attention focused on the problem before it may actually get resolved.

Comment Expensive and irrelevant (Score 5, Interesting) 213

I've been a member for some time but let it lapse a few years ago because it got to the point that the benefits didn't justify the expense. Or rather, the benefits hadn't justified the expense for some time, I finally got fed up hoping that might change. I finally noticed I wasn't getting my money's worth and pulled the plug on it. Much of ACM seems designed to extract maximum income from its membership. That gravy train is over, as far as I'm concerned.

Comment Re:Lies and statistics... (Score 1) 570

My wife and I have adopted a policy of not paying until at least 6 months later, or after those two sort it out, since you can never get your money BACK once sent, but until they settle it out there's no way to know what is owed..

I generally had this policy, but now that I've got $1500 deductible and $4500 out of pocket maximum, and this year am having to have cataract surgery, I went ahead and paid the $450 prep office visit bill. If the insurance company didn't negotiate it quickly and correctly, it's their loss because it's clear I'm going to exceed the out-of-pocket this year by enough that THEY will end up paying for anything they fail to properly negotiate. And in fact I've got another minor issue I'm going to be sure to take care of this year, because once the max is reached, everything else is free for that year. So for the rest of this year anyway, I've got the Caddilac plan.

Comment Where's Steve Jobs when you need him? (Score 1) 544

I don't want a phone with ANY kind of keyboard, slide-out or virtual or whatever. A ONE button phone would be just fine. In fact, I don't even care if it has a screen, either, as I won't be looking at it. A phone is a mobile voice device, not a laptop or desktop computer, video game machine or TV. If I want something like that I'll get a tablet or laptop, not a phone. Take your instant messaging text and jam it up your ass.

Comment Re:Price of using scientists as political pawns (Score 1) 342

Given the military budgets are VASTLY different between the US and all other countries, comparing taxes with other countries makes no sense at all. Or do you figure the militaries aren't paid for by taxes? Or maybe you figure business gains no benefit from military operations, and therefore shouldn't have to foot the bill for them? Better look again, at least in the US, business gains PLENTY from the military expenditures, since much of the money is going to businesses that provide what the military needs. The US military is the biggest customer for a lot of US businesses. And as another user commented, plenty of these businesses don't pay ANY taxes (GE as one example).

Comment Re:Price of using scientists as political pawns (Score 2) 342

If industry isn't thriving, it's not due to taxes and regulation, as there's nowhere near as much of those than there were decades ago. Taxes are down, wages are down, deregulation has been running rampant, and the oversight organizations haven't been doing their job (FDA,FCC,SEC,etc.). If industry still can't survive, could it be because the CEO's have run off with the profits and used the money to buy the politicians? Or maybe it's because employees can't afford to buy enough products anymore?

Comment Re:No, it doesn't. What the "experiment" shows... (Score 1) 619

Yes, they "cheat" more because that's how they learned to cope with the state. Any state. And given the American state's ethics, or I should say, near complete lack thereof, I see no reason to hold communist state emigre's adaptation behaviors against them. The IRS on the other hand, most likely has a different view.

Slashdot Top Deals

An Ada exception is when a routine gets in trouble and says 'Beam me up, Scotty'.

Working...