Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Open Source

What Will Microsoft's "Embrace" of Open Source Actually Achieve? 217

Nerval's Lobster writes Back in the day, Microsoft viewed open source and Linux as a threat and did its best to retaliate with FUD and patent threats. And then a funny thing happened: Whether in the name of pragmatism or simply marketing, Microsoft began a very public transition from a company of open-source haters (at least in top management) to one that's embraced some aspects of open-source computing. Last month, the company blogged that .NET Core will become open-source, adding to its previously open-sourced ASP.NET MVC, Web API, and Web Pages (Razor). There's no doubt that, at least in some respects, Microsoft wants to make a big show of being more open and supportive of interoperability. The company's even gotten involved with the .NET Foundation, an independent organization designed to assist developers with the growing collection of open-source technologies for .NET. But there's only so far Microsoft will go into the realm of open source—whereas once upon a time, the company tried to wreck the movement, now it faces the very real danger of its whole revenue model being undermined by free software. But what's Microsoft's end-goal with open source? What can the company possibly hope to accomplish, given a widespread perception that such a move on its part is the product of either fear, cynicism, or both?

Comment Re:THERE HAS NEVER BEEN CLIMATE STASIS! (Score 1) 401

Or - and here is a notion that many may find strange - could it be that the left-vs-right divide is rather artificial, and not all political parties can be neatly fitted into one of two buckets?

Perhaps this is why the two-axis system was invented.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P...

Not perfect, but a better approximation.

Slashdot Top Deals

"A car is just a big purse on wheels." -- Johanna Reynolds

Working...