Comment Re:Montreal Protocol? (Score 4, Funny) 141
Scientists say the ozone layer is in good shape thanks to the Montreal Protocol
Scientists schmientists. What does Congress have to say?
"Vote for me."
Scientists say the ozone layer is in good shape thanks to the Montreal Protocol
Scientists schmientists. What does Congress have to say?
"Vote for me."
The solution is to give them more money...
Except that's rapidly becoming non-viable, since over the past few decades, they've succeeding in capturing most of the money that exists and sequestering it so it's out of reach of the other 99% of us. Soon they'll have to find another approach if they want to continue capturing the money supply as they have been doing.
The reason why "global business leaders" don't know about technology is that they are completely divorced from the daily life that normal humans live. They don't have to know shit, so they don't know shit.
And Carly Fiorina, who Portfolio Magazine named as one of the 20 worst American CEOs in history, now wants to be President of the United States.
She's just upping her game, trying to become the worst American president in history. But she'll find that there's a lot of fierce competition for that title. Can she make it? Stay tuned
People keep arguing that
Heck, there might be strings out there that will crash any Unicode library implementation, just we haven't found them yet because the search space is huge.
Hmmm
Let's see how
Nope; the 3 Hanzi characters didn't show at all, and only the à showed correctly in the second name. But both everything looks correct in this second editing widget. This proves that
I see that the "Comment:" edit widget for this message does have the Hanzi and marked 'u' and 'o' characters missing. So the damage is done after you hit the Submit button. There's no excuse for this. None of those characters have any special meaning to the code, and text containing them can't do any damage to anything. If damage happens, it's the fault of the crappy software handling the text, not the fault of the creator of the text. The right thing to do is to correct the crappy software. Damaging the text is simply idiotic, and interferes with the main reason (communication between literate people) that Unicode was invented.
(And we might note that a significant fraction of the users of the Internet now consists of people who communicate via Hanzi text, or Arabic or any of the hundreds of other character sets that humanity uses to communicate. Damaging those folks' texts to avoid fixing your crappy software is a good way to tell them that you don't want them communicating with other people. This is rapidly becoming a commercially untenable position for people trying to "attract eyes" on the Net.
My roommate is an expert on string theory and the laws of grabbity. I really should trim her claws.
Judging from the negative mod I got for my remark, the answer is yes, I was right, and yes it was inconvenient for the Fandroids out there.
People keep arguing that
Heck, there might be strings out there that will crash any Unicode library implementation, just we haven't found them yet because the search space is huge.
Hmmm
Let's see how
Nope; the 3 Hanzi characters didn't show at all, and only the à showed correctly in the second name. But both everything looks correct in this second editing widget. This proves that
How are those six year old sour grapes tasting?
Wasn't It Android the main ingredient of a botnet half a million strong a couple of years ago?
Slashdot Headline Poisoning claims another victim.
Today I learned that Powerpoint makes bad presentations.
I mean to say 'customer' not 'company'. Sorry about my haste, there.
See what? I'm not an On-Star company, I don't know how they advertise to you.
Unless this were a story about Microsoft, then it'd be fair game.
The one day you'd sell your soul for something, souls are a glut.