Comment Re:Too bad so much Creative Commons is poisoned. (Score 1) 39
So what you're saying is we now have the Tragedy of the [Creative] Commons ?
So what you're saying is we now have the Tragedy of the [Creative] Commons ?
Thanks for the correction. I agree that the term "IR" is used for rather a wide range of wavelengths.
I don't mind when people state clearly that they don't really understand the absorption & radiation equations, but it does kinda piss me off when these same people pontificate as though they did.
Here's how this new microlayer thing works:
First, it's highly reflective in the visible. That keeps a lot of energy from every entering (and being absorbed in) the building.
Second, it's highly absorptive in the IR. Due to the reciprocity laws, this means it's also highly emissive in the IR (and btw it's also NOT emissive in the visible since it's reflective there), but that doesn't matter. Why? Because the Black Body radiation laws show that the radiative emissions for objects in the 250 K to 350 K range, which pretty much covers buildings, people, etc., are very high in the IR and almost nonexistent in the visible range.
What this means is that most solar input energy is reflected away and simultaneously lots of local thermal energy is emitted away. win-win (at least if you like it cool).
Yeah, I generally google for "CRAN R" or "bioconductor R" to narrow down the field a bit.
Or you could just skim StackOverflow for the "R" tag.
Oh, great: the infamous "up to X times..." . So what's the mean and standard deviation of the relative break strength?
Out of the hundreds of millions of votes cast over that past 14 years they've found less than 30 cases if in-person voting fraud which is a fraud rate of less than 0.00001%. Voter ID is just a solution looking for a problem.
If only that last sentence were true. VoterID is a solution to a major problem: getting rid of people who don't vote Republican. If you think the whole megillah was set up with actual fraud-protection in mind, you're seriously naive.
Seems to me that kids who want to learn to hack around with a computer can quite well do so on their own, thank you. No need for some set of lessons, be they gov't-approved or not.
I mean, really: at the very worst, 10 minutes with a search engine, the term " introduction and tutorial for $LANGUAGE" or Stackoverflow should get anyone capable of comprehending what programming is in the first place off and running.
This story is exactly why I've encapsulated my self-notes and comments in c-code-style markings:
It's trivial to skim a document for the existence of such markups. Yeah, it takes a little-self-discipline while writing, but it sure pays off.
I can't help but wonder if people will be put off by the idea of a universe where the only sentient beings are humans, from earth.
Obvious rejoinder:
Wait, sentient beings from Earth? That's major Sci-Fi right there!
Old World Problems.
Also known as the "Make me a ham sandwich" epitaph.
Hey,it works fine if you preface it with "Sudo..."
"Pearl" developer == can take an irritating grain of sand and polish it until is has a shiny luster.
Well, that's a far more useful skill than what most managers spend their time polishing.
(someone had to say it)
Yeah, but,
[joke, dammit!!!]
There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.