Comment Re:I love reading about this stuff... (Score 1) 129
The people in your TV set
All are welcome.
The people in your TV set
All are welcome.
I for one don't want to give Physics research a blank check to investigate some unobservable math fantasy.
Why not? And who exactly is asking for a "blank check"?
you must consult with Imagination before you change it.
Yes. And what happens then?
I haven't in general met many professors (or EEs) who understand much about intellectual property.
OK. Can we see your agreements, please? Because that did sound very much like trolling for additional intellectual property to add to your portfolio.
People who read this article have pointed out three open CPU designs in addition to the one that I remembered.
While your product might be "production ready", please keep in mind that open projects are very often written to a higher standard than commercial ones, and the researchers involved are no less professional than your own developers. And their projects come with fewer intellectual property issues than yours.
It's only "free" for academia.
Not even them. This is a lure for universities to create tech that they are not allowed to produce in hardware, but the company that provided the original tech can monetize.
The patent terms are whatever they want them to be. In general "reasonable" and "patent" don't happen together much. And "tiny", well I really doubt it.
Having a company provide funds for a research grant and then reap the patent royalties isn't in general a good thing for society. The student researchers get paid like slave labor (if they get paid at all) and put what may be the best idea of their lives in some company's pockets.
It's very common these days for companies to allow universities to use their technology at the cost of tying the company into the university's patent revenue. And of course this is often publicly-funded research, so not only is the taxpayer paying for the development of patents used to sue that same taxpayer, the patents go directly to a company from academia.
The net effect is to feed intellectual property centered companies at the expense of the technology sector in general and small technology companies in particular.
if everything is automated, there is no more poor or middle class
besides, a poor country like the philippines: everyone has a maid and a driver. even the maids have maids and drivers
having people work for you is not proof of being rich. it's a proof of overpopulation
Basically funded bogus studies and had a negative press campaign as they came out.
Sacharine-- it turns out-- is actually quite safe while aspartame is bad for some people regardless of how it is handled. Handled improperly (over 100 degrees) it breaks down into bad stuff... but also many people break it down into bad stuff anyway and get headaches from it.
Since most of the artists I listen to on streaming services are dead, should they be paying me?
if a disease can spread because it can find enough vectors since not enough vaccinate, you are also giving the disease time and space to tinker, and perhaps evolve a new strain that existing vaccines don't protect against
so: yup. but that's less superrich killing and more superstupid killing us
i always thought it would make a great conspiracy dystopian story where the superrich, with everything automated, don't need us anymore
so they simply kill us all off
the earth reduced to 700,000 souls from 7,000,000,000 in a matter of days (some sort of highly infectious agent?)
Truth has always been found to promote the best interests of mankind... - Percy Bysshe Shelley