Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:I can't imagine something like that in the U.S. (Score 1) 162

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. It's those unions. Those ones whose membership has been steadily and measurably been decreasing for 30 years(almost exactly at the same rate as wage stagnation occurs, as a complete coincidence).

Public service unions are the major exception; the general decline is irrelevant when US mass transit is still almost completely union.

Comment Re:OPEC to subsidize its demise? (Score 1) 385

The subsidies for fossil fuels by first-world western nations (and China) (those in a position to fund green energy technologies) are a small percentage of the total. Most fossil fuel subsidies are done by oil producing nations as a form of population pacification. The idea that these funds are available for redirection is ludicrous.

Sure, but that's only half the problem. The other half is the idea that throwing money at renewables will actually reduce CO2 production.

Comment Re:Long term jobs are rare and getting rarer. (Score 1) 282

I've seen managers cry because they had to fire people. I'm inclined to agree though, but more in terms of "take care of yourself first".

Sure, your boss might be a decent guy who wouldn't kick you to the curb if it was his choice, but it won't be. Worst I've seen was a company where the location director was laying people off in waves; he was a decent guy, and worst of all, he had to know that when he laid off all his subordinates he'd be gone too (which he was).

Comment Re:On this 4th of July... (Score 1) 349

You really have a warped sense of the law here. Note, you aren't filing a countersuit here, you are filing a counter-notice and expecting them to file a formal lawsuit against you if they want to continue. They, the guys who filed the original DMCA notice, need to spend their money filing the lawsuit and going before a federal judge to explain why they want to see you in court.

Those guys either ARE lawyers (in the case of these "IP Protection" firms or have lawyers on staff. Suing you is just a cost of doing business for them. You talked about hiring a lawyer "for 100% of the award". For you to do that would require that you file a countersuit, and that some lawyer would have confidence such a suit would succeed (when, as far as I know, only one ever has, against Diebold). And you'd still have to defend, with your own cash money, the original lawsuit.

Where do you get this notion that the law doesn't apply to you, me, or anybody else other than some special elite?

They apply to the non-elite, in that we are restricted by it.

Are you really serious about this belief that laws don't matter and don't actually protect anybody but somebody with seven+ figures in their bank account?

Uh, yeah.

Comment Re:On this 4th of July... (Score 1) 349

When I say that I think it is a stupid thing to have each possible copyright infringement go to a judge for review, I think it is not only a waste of time for that judge but also for me as well.

You are making the accusation. Why should the burden not be on you?

I am simply asserting that in my case the DMCA is my friend in terms of even giving me a tool to enforce my copyright claims.

Sure, the DMCA gives you and any copyright owner the ability to issue what amounts to an ex-parte temporary restraining order to any ISP without involving a court. That's pretty fucked up.

Comment Re:google doens't need to stir up dissent (Score 3, Insightful) 74

For example, when the Alien & Sedition Acts were passed, while Democrats like Thomas Jefferson were vehemently opposed, nobody would have thought to argue it unconstitutional on Free Speech grounds.

Democratic-Republicans -- usually called Republicans -- if you please. Jefferson's party is the parent of both parties today, though he'd hardly recognize either. And of course they were argued as unconstitutional on free speech grounds. See the third Kentucky Resolution.

Comment Betteridge wins again (Score 2) 66

Even if these initiatives weren't both limited and in partnership with other groups, just what would Google do that would be harmful to K-12 computer science education? Make everyone learn Go?

Now, if you want a real issue, go check on the Gates Foundation's influence on the much-derided Common Core.

(Disclosure: I work for Google, but this means less than you probably think)

Comment Re:On this 4th of July... (Score 2) 349

Hell yes, in a New York minute. I even think I would be willing to find a lawyer that could take 100% of any sort of damage award (aka I don't want anything other than to see the troll rot in hell) in exchange for the case.

Not a chance. The DMCA is set up so the chance of winning a countersuit is so small that no lawyer would take such a case on contingency. You'd have to pay yourself. And that's after paying to defend yourself from the original suit, however meritless it may be.

The problem is if you are already in a legal grey area of copyright law, in which case you should think twice about sending the counter-notice.

Oh, you're a just-worlder. No. Doesn't matter. There ain't no justice. The individual can't afford to win a lawsuit (where "winning" means you don't lose any more money and you get to keep your content up, not that you get any damages yourself), let alone lose.

Slashdot Top Deals

And it should be the law: If you use the word `paradigm' without knowing what the dictionary says it means, you go to jail. No exceptions. -- David Jones

Working...