If you post and set it to "show only to certain people" (or whatever the settings are on your social media outlet of choice) then yes there IS an expectation that people outside the group can't see it.

If a cop is posing as as a teenager or college kid online so they can hang out in chat-rooms and hook pedophiles that's one thing (pedophiles are scum who deserve to be locked away in one of those nasty jails they show on various TV documentaries) but if they are doing it to bust up a few kids having some beers (and presumably harming no-one except themselves) then that's different and shouldn't be allowed.

Better yet, why not make a dongle that can pull content directly from the NAS via SAMBA, supports every codec known to man (including the obscure ones) by using something like FFMPEG (with hardware accelerated decoding for the codecs where the hardware can do it) and can be controlled via a normal remote or via an app (one that exists on all the necessary platforms).

As for DRM (which is necessary if you want Netflix etc) just get Adobe to port the same DRM blob being used for Firefox on Windows to the new device and let the blob handle the DRM.

If I was Sony I would be splitting the company into 3 pieces, one for the movie and music operations, one for the consumer electronics division (Bravia TVs, CyberShot & Alpha cameras etc etc) and one for the PlayStation division and their video games empire.

A 3-way split means the consumer electronics division will no longer be restricted by the need to not do anything that would piss off the guys over in the content creation division. Also people who hate Sony and refuse to buy their products due to the crap their content creation division does (come on, they made & sold a whole pile of audio CDs that installed malware on basically any Windows PC you put the disk into) would be able to buy from the (presumably no longer super-evil) stand-alone consumer electronics company knowing they aren't supporting the super-evil content creation part of the company.

RadioShack knew a few years ago that they needed to change but they continued to sell crap no-one wanted to buy from them like crappy cellphone plans and overpriced junk. That and the whole "we need your entire life story and all your personal details before we can sell you that pack of AA batteries" BS.

If they had acted sooner, dropped the crap people didn't want like the cellphone plans and anything else that they couldn't get people to buy, dropped the personal data harvesting and maybe introduced some new product lines that people might actually go to RadioShack to buy, they could have saved the business.

I have a Canon PowerShot SX130IS 12.1 megapixel mid-range point & shoot camera (well it was mid range when it came out). Its got a bigger sensor, bigger lens and higher optical zoom level (12x) than any smartphone camera I have ever seen, including the one on my Nokia N900.

For photographing LEGO creations (and getting right in there for close-ups, the macro mode and bigger/better sensor beats any smartphone hands down.

And for photographing when out and about (e.g. buildings, buses, trains, planes etc) where you want to be able to zoom in on things further away the 12x optical zoom easily beats the 0x optical zoom on all the smartphone cameras.

Unless you are being totally dumb and storing passwords in plain text or something instead of hashing them, there is no good reason why any website should have a maximum password length.

Oh and also they should change the way the airlines (i.e. those doing regular scheduled services, however the FAA defines those) get charged all the airport and airspace fees so as to make it beneficial for the airlines to run fewer services with bigger airplanes instead of more services with smaller planes.

I think they should both drop ALL subsidies for the commercial airlines AND drop all the regulations that restrain competition in the aviation market (i.e. the rule that requires domestic carriers in the US to be US-owned and made it so hard for Virgin America to get going)

Too bad "entire toolchain" doesn't include nice things like their C/C++ compiler and runtimes :(

Does this "acceptable ads" policy include a requirement that the ad servers in question not be serving malware alongside the ads?

Because that is by far the biggest reason I run an ad blocker.

I know fresh ingredients are better tasting and I have had fresh-made many times before (but with tomato paste rather than actual tomatoes) but the jar stuff is both more convenient AND cheaper (I did the math to confirm this). As for the sugar content, I get 4 servings out of one jar and the nutrition information says one such serving contains only 8% of the recommended daily intake of sugar. One serving also contains a single serve of veggies. Oh and the ingredients list doesn't mention a single preservative or anything else artificial, just natural ingredients.

The alternative is to look at the kind of diet eaten by people who don't have problems with obesity, heart disease, type 2 diabetes etc and eat food more like that.

Such food would contain a LOT less simple sugars (whether from sugar cane, sugar beets, corn or elsewhere), less fat, more low-GI sustained energy from complex carbohydrates, more fruits and vegetables, more fiber and more vitamins and minerals than the diet of a large chunk of the US population currently does.

The whole "fat is bad" mantra that started in the 80s is actually one of the root causes of the obesity epidemic in the US. The "fat is bad" mantra lead to food companies removing fat from their foods. But in order to keep the taste levels high, they needed something else. And that something else is a whole family of chemicals extracted from corn including High Fructose Corn Syrup.

There is evidence that HFCS and the other corn products contribute to obesity much more than either fat OR cane sugar but the corn industry is so powerful that no-one of any substance has the guts to challenge them and really fight.

IMO the excellent documentary Food, Inc should be required viewing for American school kids. Show them where their food REALLY comes from.

Here in Australia I can buy 500g of lean beef mince, 500g of spaghetti and a 500g jar of tomato pasta sauce for around A$10. That much food makes 4-5 servings of Spaghetti. (and you probably only need about 1/2-2/3 of the packet of spaghetti). Oh and that pasta only takes about 15-20 minutes to cook depending on how long the water takes to boil.

To get food for 4 people from any of the fast food options in my area I would need to spend at least A$20 if not more and I would get food that is less healthy AND less filling. To buy, say, a 4-person serving of a preprocessed frozen heat-and-eat pasta would also cost more than the A$10 it costs to make it myself.

Is it really so bad in America that its cheaper to buy the unhealthy preprocessed crap than it is to buy actual ingredients and make it yourself? (oh and btw, the A$10 price could be reduced by buying cheaper mince with a bit more fat as well as cheaper supermarket brand pasta and sauce)

Its ironic that they are selling to Sprint given that its the cellphone crap (and their stupid requirement that everyone who enters the store has to be given the cellphone hard-sell BS) that has caused so much of their problems.