When it goes wrong, it renders a different large area of land uninhabitable.

Still, when done right, better than a lot of other options.

I would speculate she is not competent enough for certain voters and not irrational enough for certain others, but by participating as a candidate, she will have an effect on which other candidates will be viable, by making others look good or bad by comparison.

They could never merge - they're as different as Coke and Pepsi.

Those people in particular want a lot more than just to understand.

If there's an actual case for safety, I'll all for it.

But so far the people advocating for it are clearly motivated by voyeurism.

And we can spell.

Ikea is not the best corporate citizen, nor do they have the best quality or the best prices.

But their stuff is clever. I like clever. Why can't other manufacturers think ahead and from the customer's perspective like that?

Getting elected requires saying false things, convincingly, year after year. To do that requires being a sociopath, uninformed, or genuinely mentally ill. Or more than one of the above.

That Mass is a real thing and not just a "theory"? Do we have any proof yet? I know there is almost no intel coming in on it, so it is easy to keep up with and/or follow.

What were *you* in trouble for? Having curiosity and compassion about a fellow human being?

Enforceable or not, the statement it makes about their attitude towards their employees is pretty clear.

A lot of contemporary software is so bloated that it's quite a convoluted process to read the underlying e-mail in the form of an actual e-mail in the 'classic' sense.

And while I would concede that Brandstad seems less informed about technology than average, we really could use some clearer terminology to distinguish the proliferation of forms of communication.

It is *always* the man and woman who are expected to share that responsibility equally.

Yet 90% of the time the woman takes on that responsibility by her own choice.

Scientists (with perhaps a few exceptions) leave room for the possibility that the theory of dark matter is wrong. Uninformed journalists - not so much.

Given how old this 'insight' is, I think it comes from the latter group.

Of course there's a chance, but it doesn't look like a 'good' chance. If the dark matter hypothesis is wrong, it's likely wrong yet highly insightful in the same way that Newtonian gravity is wrong.